Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜手术在卵巢组织冻存中的应用。

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.

Infertility and IVF Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):474-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To present single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) as an alternative to standard multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred thirty-one patients referred for oncologic fertility preservation.

INTERVENTION

Non-inferiority comparison of SILS with MPLS for ovarian cryopreservation for future transplantation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared duration of the procedure, intra- and postoperative complications, hospital stay, and time (days) from surgery to chemotherapy. We additionally compared number of ampules (each ampule contains 10 slivers of ovarian cortex tissue) preserved and number of oocytes retrieved during the preparation process. Adjustments for age, previous chemotherapy, and partial versus complete oophorectomy ratio were performed. MPLS was performed in 163 patients (71.2%) and SILS in 66 patients (28.8%). Ten patients (15.2%) in the SILS group and 32 (19.8%) in the MPLS group were prepubertal. Malignant conditions distribution was similar. Procedure duration and overall complication rates were similar. Number of ampules extracted from the preserved tissue was somewhat higher in the SILS group as compared with the MPLS group (14.7 vs 10.6, respectively; p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that SILS is an interesting alternative to MPLS. Future prospective trials may prove some benefit in ovarian tissue volume or time until chemotherapy initiation.

摘要

研究目的

介绍单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)作为标准多孔腹腔镜手术(MPLS)的替代方案,用于卵巢组织冷冻保存。

设计

回顾性队列研究(加拿大任务组分类 II-2)。

设置

三级医疗中心。

患者

231 名因肿瘤而接受生育力保存的患者。

干预

SILS 与 MPLS 用于未来移植的卵巢冷冻保存的非劣效性比较。

测量和主要结果

我们比较了手术过程的持续时间、术中及术后并发症、住院时间以及从手术到化疗的时间(天)。我们还比较了在准备过程中保存的安瓿数量(每个安瓿含有 10 片卵巢皮质组织)和回收的卵母细胞数量。对年龄、既往化疗以及部分与完全卵巢切除术比例进行了调整。163 例患者(71.2%)接受 MPLS 治疗,66 例患者(28.8%)接受 SILS 治疗。SILS 组中有 10 例(15.2%)患者为青春期前,MPLS 组中有 32 例(19.8%)为青春期前。恶性疾病的分布相似。手术时间和总并发症发生率相似。从保存的组织中提取的安瓿数量在 SILS 组中略高于 MPLS 组(分别为 14.7 个和 10.6 个;p<0.01)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,SILS 是 MPLS 的一种有吸引力的替代方案。未来的前瞻性试验可能会证明在卵巢组织体积或化疗开始时间方面存在一些益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验