Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX.
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Dec;13(12):e992-e1001. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.024810. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
Drivers of variation in the cost of care after chemoradiotherapy for the management of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have not been fully elucidated. We sought to characterize the direct and indirect impact of radiotherapy modality on health care costs among patients with anal SCC.
A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2014 linkage of the SEER-Medicare database. We identified 1,025 patients with anal SCC diagnosed between 2001 and 2011 and treated with chemoradiotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences between patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and those treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Differences in total, cancer-attributable, and procedure-specific costs between groups were measured.
Radiation-related, patient out-of-pocket, and total costs in the 1-year period after radiotherapy start were all higher for the IMRT group than the 3D-CRT group (median total cost, $35,890 v $27,262, respectively; P < .001). Patients who received IMRT had lower cumulative costs associated with urgent hospitalizations and emergency department visits at both 9 months and 1 year after treatment start compared with a matched cohort of patients who received 3D-CRT (median, $711 v $4,957 at 1 year, respectively; P = .021).
Although total costs of care were higher for IMRT compared with 3D-CRT, primarily as a result of higher radiotherapy-specific costs, IMRT was associated with decreased unplanned health care utilization costs starting at 9 months after treatment start. Radiotherapy-centered episodes of care may need to encompass a longer time horizon to capture the full cost savings associated with more advanced radiation modalities.
化学放疗后肛门鳞癌(SCC)管理费用的变化驱动因素尚未完全阐明。我们旨在分析放疗方式对肛门 SCC 患者医疗成本的直接和间接影响。
本研究采用 2014 年 SEER-Medicare 数据库的回顾性队列研究。我们共纳入了 1025 例 2001 至 2011 年间接受放化疗的肛门 SCC 患者,并采用倾向评分匹配平衡了接受调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)患者之间的基线差异。测量两组之间的总费用、癌症相关费用和特定程序费用的差异。
放疗开始后 1 年内,IMRT 组的放疗相关费用、患者自付费用和总费用均高于 3D-CRT 组(中位数总费用分别为 35890 美元和 27262 美元,P<0.001)。与接受 3D-CRT 的匹配队列相比,接受 IMRT 的患者在放疗开始后 9 个月和 1 年时紧急住院和急诊就诊的累积成本较低(中位数分别为 711 美元和 4957 美元,P=0.021)。
尽管与 3D-CRT 相比,IMRT 的总医疗成本更高,主要是由于放疗特异性成本较高,但 IMRT 与治疗开始后 9 个月时无计划医疗保健利用成本的降低相关。以放疗为中心的治疗阶段可能需要更长的时间才能获得与更先进的放疗模式相关的全部成本节约。