• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用新型成像系统减少儿科心导管实验室的辐射

Radiation Reduction in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory Using a Novel Imaging System.

作者信息

Manu Stephen, Suntharos Patcharapong, Boyle Gerard J, Wang Lu, Prieto Lourdes R

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, M 41 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jan;30(1):28-33. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

PMID:29035845
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Radiation dose was compared between two modern imaging systems with different x-ray tube technology (Megalix vs Gigalix) and detector type (amorphous vs crystalline silicon) at the same institution.

BACKGROUND

Further reduction in radiation dose than currently reported may be achievable with advances in x-ray tube and detector technology.

METHODS

Radiation dose (air kerma, dose-area product [DAP]) was retrospectively compared for post-transplant pediatric patients undergoing right heart catheterization/biopsy (fluoroscopy only) or "annual" catheterization with coronary angiography in one of two imaging systems between January 2014 and December 2016. Comparisons were also made with published radiation doses.

RESULTS

A total of 122 right heart catheterizations with biopsy were performed in the Megalix/amorphous silicon (Si) lab and 168 in the Gigalix/crystalline Si lab. Age and weight were not statistically different for the two groups. There was a 50% decrease in median air kerma (2.2 mGy vs 1.1 mGy; P<.001) and 66% decrease in median DAP (52.2 μGy•m² vs 18.0 μGy•m²; P<.001) for the Gigalix/crystalline Si lab. A total of 24 "annual" catheterizations were performed in the Megalix/amorphous Si lab and 22 were performed in the Gigalix/crystalline Si lab. There was a 57% reduction in median air kerma (458.6 mGy vs 198.6 mGy; P<.001) and a 46% reduction in median DAP (2548.0 μGy•m² vs 1367.1 μGy•m²; P<.01) for the Gigalix/crystalline Si lab. Similar reductions were found on comparison with published doses.

CONCLUSION

The Gigalix tube and crystalline Si detector decrease radiation dose by 50%-60% for fluoroscopy and cine acquisition in pediatric patients.

摘要

目的

在同一机构中,比较两种采用不同X射线管技术(Megalix与Gigalix)和探测器类型(非晶硅与晶体硅)的现代成像系统之间的辐射剂量。

背景

随着X射线管和探测器技术的进步,可能实现比目前报道的更低的辐射剂量。

方法

回顾性比较2014年1月至2016年12月期间在两种成像系统之一中接受右心导管检查/活检(仅透视)或“年度”导管检查及冠状动脉造影的移植后儿科患者的辐射剂量(空气比释动能、剂量面积乘积[DAP])。还与已发表的辐射剂量进行了比较。

结果

在Megalix/非晶硅实验室共进行了122例右心导管检查及活检,在Gigalix/晶体硅实验室进行了168例。两组的年龄和体重无统计学差异。Gigalix/晶体硅实验室的中位空气比释动能降低了50%(2.2 mGy对1.1 mGy;P<0.001),中位DAP降低了66%(52.2 μGy•m²对18.0 μGy•m²;P<0.001)。在Megalix/非晶硅实验室共进行了24例“年度”导管检查,在Gigalix/晶体硅实验室进行了22例。Gigalix/晶体硅实验室的中位空气比释动能降低了57%(458.6 mGy对198.6 mGy;P<0.001),中位DAP降低了46%(2548.0 μGy•m²对1367.1 μGy•m²;P<0.01)。与已发表剂量比较发现了类似的降低。

结论

Gigalix管和晶体硅探测器可使儿科患者透视和电影采集的辐射剂量降低50%-60%。

相似文献

1
Radiation Reduction in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory Using a Novel Imaging System.使用新型成像系统减少儿科心导管实验室的辐射
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jan;30(1):28-33. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
2
Reducing Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterizations for Congenital Heart Disease.减少先天性心脏病心脏导管插入术中的辐射暴露
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):638-649. doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-2039-9. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Pediatric patient radiation dosage during endomyocardial biopsies and right heart catheterization using a standard "ALARA" radiation reduction protocol in the modern fluoroscopic era.儿科患者在现代透视时代使用标准“ALARA”辐射减少方案进行心内膜心肌活检和右心导管检查时的辐射剂量。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):80-3. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25058. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
4
Radiation Protocol for Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography to Limit Procedural Radiation Exposure in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab.三维旋转血管造影术的辐射方案,以限制儿科心脏导管实验室中的手术辐射暴露
Congenit Heart Dis. 2016 Dec;11(6):637-646. doi: 10.1111/chd.12356. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.使用用于心脏血管造影和介入的X射线成像降噪技术降低患者辐射剂量。
Heart Vessels. 2016 May;31(5):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0667-z. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
6
Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.使用飞利浦AlluraClarity X射线系统降低儿科心脏导管插入实验室的辐射剂量。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Dec;38(8):1583-1591. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1700-z. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
Radiation Reduction Capabilities of a Next-Generation Pediatric Imaging Platform.下一代儿科成像平台的辐射降低能力
Pediatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):24-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1233-2. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
Achievable radiation reduction during pediatric cardiac catheterization: How low can we go?小儿心脏导管插入术中可实现的辐射剂量降低:我们能降低到多低?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;86(5):841-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26024. Epub 2015 May 22.
9
Standardizing radiation dose reporting in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory-a multicenter study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium).小儿心导管实验室辐射剂量报告的标准化——先天性心血管介入研究联盟(CCISC)的一项多中心研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 1;84(5):785-93. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25467. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
10
The Impact of Novel X-Ray Systems and X-Ray System Optimization on Patient Radiation Dose Administered During Cardiac Catheterization.新型 X 射线系统和 X 射线系统优化对心血管造影术患者辐射剂量的影响。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Jun;32(6):218-221. doi: 10.25270/jic/19.00452. Epub 2020 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the reduction of radiation dose received by pediatric patients in new-generation biplane angiocardiography: Randomized controlled study.新一代双平面心血管造影术中儿科患者所接受辐射剂量降低情况的评估:随机对照研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 22;10(7):e28138. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28138. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Multicenter Assessment of Radiation Exposure during Pediatric Cardiac Catheterizations Using a Novel Imaging System.多中心评估新型影像系统在小儿心导管检查中的放射暴露。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Oct 31;2019:7639754. doi: 10.1155/2019/7639754. eCollection 2019.