• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中子屏蔽材料的实验评估

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF NEUTRON SHIELDING MATERIALS.

作者信息

Campo X, Méndez R, Lacerda M A S, Garrido D, Embid M, Sanz J

机构信息

esearch Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology, Av. Complutense 40, Madrid, Spain.

ational Distance Education University, Juan del Rosal, 12, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Aug 1;180(1-4):382-385. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx202.

DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncx202
PMID:29036700
Abstract

A new proposed design of neutron shielding material-based on the commercial material Borotron UH050 with an addition of Al(OH)3-is evaluated in order to determine if its neutron and gamma shielding properties match those of a reference material, NS4FR. Neutron and gamma dosimetry measurements are performed, as well as neutron spectrometry measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Negligible differences are found between the materials for neutron shielding, while significant differences are found for gamma shielding. The effect of Al(OH)3 addition to Borotron UH050 is to reduce neutron shielding properties while increasing gamma shielding properties. The resulting material is as efficient as NS4FR for neutron shielding but less efficient for gamma shielding-thicknesses 20% higher are required to match gamma shielding properties of NS4FR. Monte Carlo models of the materials are validated based on the performed measurements of neutron spectra and neutron and gamma ambient dose equivalent.

摘要

为了确定一种基于商用材料硼特龙UH050并添加了氢氧化铝的新型中子屏蔽材料设计的中子和伽马屏蔽特性是否与参考材料NS4FR相匹配,对其进行了评估。进行了中子和伽马剂量测量,以及中子能谱测量和蒙特卡罗模拟。在中子屏蔽方面,两种材料之间的差异可忽略不计,而在伽马屏蔽方面则发现了显著差异。向硼特龙UH050中添加氢氧化铝的效果是降低中子屏蔽特性,同时提高伽马屏蔽特性。所得材料在中子屏蔽方面与NS4FR一样有效,但在伽马屏蔽方面效率较低——需要高出20%的厚度才能匹配NS4FR的伽马屏蔽特性。基于所进行的中子能谱以及中子和伽马环境剂量当量测量,对材料的蒙特卡罗模型进行了验证。

相似文献

1
EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF NEUTRON SHIELDING MATERIALS.中子屏蔽材料的实验评估
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Aug 1;180(1-4):382-385. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx202.
2
Effectiveness of customised neutron shielding in the maze of radiotherapy accelerators.定制中子屏蔽在放射治疗加速器迷宫中的有效性。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2003;107(4):233-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006395.
3
Arrangement of high-energy neutron irradiation field and shielding experiment using 4 m concrete at KENS.高能中子辐照场的布置及在日本国立放射医学综合研究所使用4米厚混凝土的屏蔽实验
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;116(1-4 Pt 2):553-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci013.
4
Shielding design calculations for beam dump facility of KOMAC.韩国加速器复合体研究所(KOMAC)束流卸料装置的屏蔽设计计算
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;116(1-4 Pt 2):259-63. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci066.
5
Calculations of neutron shielding data for 10-100 MeV proton accelerators.10 - 100兆电子伏质子加速器的中子屏蔽数据计算。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;116(1-4 Pt 2):245-51. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci193.
6
Multileaf shielding design against neutrons produced by medical linear accelerators.针对医用直线加速器产生的中子的多叶屏蔽设计。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;128(2):227-33. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm312. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
7
MCNP simulation to optimise in-pile and shielding parts of the Portuguese SANS instrument.用于优化葡萄牙小角中子散射仪堆内和屏蔽部件的蒙特卡罗N粒子输运程序模拟
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;116(1-4 Pt 2):562-5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci159.
8
Validation of source biasing method for its use in CSNS beamline shielding calculation.源偏置方法用于中国散裂中子源束流线屏蔽计算的验证
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014 Dec;162(3):208-14. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct343. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
9
Design and verification of the shielding around the new Neutron Standards Laboratory (LPN) at CIEMAT.西班牙能源、环境和技术研究中心新中子标准实验室(LPN)周围屏蔽设施的设计与验证
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014 Oct;161(1-4):393-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct348. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Shielding analysis at the upper section of the accelerator-driven system.加速器驱动系统上部的屏蔽分析。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;116(1-4 Pt 2):256-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci062.