Division of Vascular Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
Division of Vascular Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Nov;5(6):789-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.05.020.
Patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis are at risk for development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Iliac vein stenting has been shown to significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with venous outflow obstruction, although many studies include a heterogeneous population with several different venous pathologic processes. Our objective was to evaluate the results of iliocaval and infrainguinal venous intervention for venous outflow obstruction due to post-thrombotic chronic venous occlusive disease.
All patients treated at a single institution for symptomatic iliocaval venous occlusive lesions with and without infrainguinal extension between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were excluded from analysis. All patients with symptomatic post-thrombotic occlusion of the iliac vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) and a Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) score of 3 or greater were included. Demographics of the patients, presence of IVC filters at presentation, presenting CEAP score, postintervention CEAP score, primary and secondary patency, wound healing and subjective clinical improvement outcomes, and procedural details were recorded in a database.
There were 105 patients with symptomatic iliocaval venous occlusive lesions identified, of which 31 patients (42 limbs) met inclusion criteria. Presenting symptoms included pain or swelling (100%); venous claudication (81%); and CEAP class 3 (76%), 4 or 5 (14%), or 6 (10%). All patients presented with either subacute (>30 days [35%]) or chronic (>90 days [65%]) iliocaval venous thrombosis. Procedural technical success with venous recanalization was achieved in 100% of cases and in 46% of IVC filter retrieval attempts. Overall clinical improvement was achieved in 84% of patients; complete clinical resolution was obtained in 42% and a decrease in CEAP score in 65%. At a mean follow-up of 14.7 months (range, 2-49 months), primary and secondary 1-year patency was 66% and 75% overall, and primary patency was equivalent between patients requiring isolated iliac venous stenting and those requiring infrainguinal stent extension (68% vs 65%, respectively; P = .74, not significant). Patients who presented with IVC filters had a higher rate of complete clinical resolution if the filter could be removed (100%) compared with those patients in whom the filter could not be removed (17%; P < .01).
Treatment of chronic venous occlusive disease with iliocaval and infrainguinal venous stenting is associated with acceptable 1-year patency rates, healing of venous ulcers, and a significant reduction in symptoms and CEAP score. Patients who underwent successful removal of indwelling IVC filters showed improved clinical outcomes compared with those in whom the IVC filter could not be removed.
髂股深静脉血栓形成患者有发生血栓后综合征的风险。髂静脉支架置入术已被证明可显著改善静脉流出道梗阻患者的临床转归,尽管许多研究纳入了具有多种不同静脉病理过程的异质人群。我们的目的是评估髂股和腘下静脉干预治疗血栓后慢性静脉闭塞性疾病所致静脉流出道梗阻的结果。
回顾性分析 2008 年至 2015 年期间在单一机构因有症状的髂股静脉闭塞性病变且伴或不伴腘下静脉延伸而接受治疗的所有患者。排除非血栓性髂静脉病变。所有有症状的髂静脉或下腔静脉(IVC)血栓后闭塞且临床、病因、解剖和病理生理学(CEAP)评分≥3 分的患者均被纳入。数据库中记录了患者的人口统计学资料、就诊时 IVC 滤器的存在、就诊时的 CEAP 评分、干预后的 CEAP 评分、一级和二级通畅率、伤口愈合和主观临床改善情况以及手术细节。
共发现 105 例有症状的髂股静脉闭塞性病变患者,其中 31 例(42 条肢体)符合纳入标准。就诊时的症状包括疼痛或肿胀(100%);静脉性跛行(81%);CEAP 分级 3(76%)、4 或 5(14%)或 6(10%)。所有患者均为亚急性(>30 天[35%])或慢性(>90 天[65%])髂股静脉血栓形成。100%的病例实现了静脉再通的手术技术成功,46%的 IVC 滤器尝试回收成功。84%的患者获得了整体临床改善;42%的患者完全临床缓解,65%的患者 CEAP 评分降低。在平均 14.7 个月(2-49 个月)的随访中,总体 1 年一级和二级通畅率分别为 66%和 75%,需要单独髂静脉支架置入和需要腘下支架延伸的患者之间一级通畅率相当(分别为 68%和 65%;P=.74,无统计学意义)。如果能取出 IVC 滤器,有滤器的患者完全临床缓解率更高(100%),而滤器无法取出的患者则较低(17%;P<.01)。
采用髂股和腘下静脉支架置入术治疗慢性静脉闭塞性疾病,其 1 年通畅率、静脉溃疡愈合率和症状及 CEAP 评分的显著降低率均较为理想。成功取出留置 IVC 滤器的患者与无法取出滤器的患者相比,临床结局改善更明显。