• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IUI 后固定或活动:一项 RCT。

Immobilization or mobilization after IUI: an RCT.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2218-2224. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex302.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dex302
PMID:29040538
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does 15 min of immobilization after IUI improve pregnancy rates?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Immobilization for 15 min after IUI does not improve pregnancy rates.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Prior RCTs report a beneficial effect of supine immobilization for 15 min following IUI compared to immediate mobilization, however, these studies can be criticized. Given the importance for the logistics in daily practice and the lack of biological plausibility we planned a replication study prior to potential implementation of this procedure.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single centre RCT, based in an academic setting in the Netherlands, was performed. Participants were randomly assigned for 15 min of supine immobilization following IUI for a maximum of six cycles compared to the standard procedure of immediate mobilization following IUI. Participants and caregivers were not blinded to group assignment. An independent researcher used computer-generated tables to allocate treatments. Stratification occurred to the indication of IUI (unexplained or mild male subfertility). Revelation of allocation took place just before the insemination by the caregiver. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate per couple.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 498 couples diagnosed with unexplained or mild male subfertility and an indication for treatment with IUI were approached and randomized in the study, of which 244 participants were assigned to 15 min of supine immobilization and 254 participants to immediate mobilization.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Participant characteristics were comparable between the groups, and 236 participants were analysed in the immobilization group, versus 245 in the mobilization group. The ongoing pregnancy rate per couple was not found to be superior in the immobilization group (one-sided P-value = 0.97) with 76/236 ongoing pregnancies (32.2%) being accomplished in the immobilization and 98/245 ongoing pregnancies (40.0%) in the immediate mobilization group (relative risk 0.81; 95% CI [0.63, 1.02], risk difference: -7.8%, 95% CI [-16.4%, 0.8%]). No difference was found in miscarriage rate, multiple gestation rate, live birth rate and time to pregnancy between the groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to discontinuation of the planned treatment not all participants reached six IUI cycles or an ongoing pregnancy. However, this is as expected in IUI treatment and mirrors clinical practice. These participants were equally distributed across the two groups. Women with tubal pathology and endocrine disorders were excluded for this trial, and this might narrow generalizability.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study shows no positive effect of 15 min of immobilization following IUI on pregnancy rates. Based on available evidence today, including our study, a possible beneficial effect of supine immobilization after IUI is at least doubtful and straightforward implementation does not seem to be justified.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received. All authors have nothing to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch Trial Register NTR 2418.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

20 July 2010.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 11 August 2010.

摘要

研究问题

IUI 后 15 分钟的固定是否能提高妊娠率?

总结答案

IUI 后 15 分钟的固定并不能提高妊娠率。

已知情况

先前的随机对照试验(RCT)报告称,与 IUI 后立即活动相比,IUI 后 15 分钟的仰卧位固定对妊娠率有有益的影响,但这些研究可能存在争议。鉴于在日常实践中对后勤工作的重要性以及缺乏生物学上的合理性,我们计划在潜在实施该程序之前进行复制研究。

研究设计、大小和持续时间:这是一项在荷兰一所学术机构进行的单中心 RCT。参与者被随机分配接受 IUI 后 15 分钟的仰卧位固定,最多进行六次周期,而标准程序是 IUI 后立即活动。参与者和护理人员对分组分配不知情。一位独立的研究人员使用计算机生成的表格来分配治疗方法。根据 IUI 的指征(不明原因或轻度男性不育)进行分层。护理人员在授精前才揭示分组。主要结局是每对夫妇的持续妊娠率。

参与者/材料、设置和方法:共有 498 对被诊断为不明原因或轻度男性不育且有 IUI 治疗指征的夫妇被纳入研究并进行了随机分组,其中 244 名参与者被分配到 15 分钟的仰卧位固定组,254 名参与者被分配到立即活动组。

主要结果和机会的作用

参与者的特征在两组之间是可比的,在固定组中分析了 236 名参与者,而在活动组中分析了 245 名参与者。未发现固定组的持续妊娠率更高(单侧 P 值=0.97),固定组中有 76/236 名持续妊娠(32.2%),而立即活动组中有 98/245 名持续妊娠(40.0%)(相对风险 0.81;95%CI[0.63,1.02],风险差异:-7.8%,95%CI[-16.4%,0.8%])。两组之间的流产率、多胎妊娠率、活产率和妊娠时间均无差异。

局限性、谨慎的原因:由于计划治疗的中断,并非所有参与者都完成了六次 IUI 周期或实现了持续妊娠。然而,这在 IUI 治疗中是预期的,反映了临床实践。这些参与者在两组中均匀分布。该试验排除了有输卵管病变和内分泌紊乱的女性,这可能会限制其普遍性。

研究结果的更广泛意义

本研究表明,IUI 后 15 分钟的固定对妊娠率没有积极影响。根据目前现有的证据,包括我们的研究,IUI 后仰卧位固定的可能有益效果至少值得怀疑,直接实施似乎没有道理。

研究资金/利益冲突:未收到任何资助。所有作者均无利益冲突。

临床试验注册

荷兰试验注册处 NTR 2418。

临床试验注册日期

2010 年 7 月 20 日。

首次患者入组日期

2010 年 8 月 11 日。

相似文献

1
Immobilization or mobilization after IUI: an RCT.IUI 后固定或活动:一项 RCT。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2218-2224. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex302.
2
IVF or IUI as first-line treatment in unexplained subfertility: the conundrum of treatment selection markers.体外受精或宫腔内人工授精作为不明原因亚生育力的一线治疗:治疗选择标志物的难题
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1028-1032. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex037.
3
Expectant management versus IUI in unexplained subfertility and a poor pregnancy prognosis (EXIUI study): a randomized controlled trial.不明原因不孕和不良妊娠结局患者期待治疗与 IUI 治疗的比较(EXIUI 研究):一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Nov 24;37(12):2808-2816. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac236.
4
A short versus a long time interval between semen collection and intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled clinical trial.精液采集与宫腔内人工授精间隔时间的长短:一项随机对照临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):811-819. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead044.
5
Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?试管婴儿服务有两种不同方式——比控制性卵巢过度刺激下的宫腔内人工授精更具成本效益吗?
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2331-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev193. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素与枸橼酸氯米酚在宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕夫妇中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1079-88. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev062. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
Follicle stimulating hormone versus clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination for unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial.卵泡刺激素与枸橼酸氯米酚在不明原因不孕的宫腔内人工授精中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Oct 1;33(10):1866-1874. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey268.
8
Is IUI with ovarian stimulation effective in couples with unexplained subfertility?在不明原因不孕的夫妇中,经卵巢刺激的宫腔内人工授精有效吗?
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jan 1;34(1):84-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey329.
9
Intracervical insemination versus intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a randomized controlled trial.宫颈内授精与自然周期中冷冻供体精子宫腔内授精的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 30;37(6):1175-1182. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac071.
10
Natural conception rates in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility scheduled for fertility treatment: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.不明原因或轻度男性不育症夫妇进行生育治疗的自然受孕率:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Hum Reprod. 2018 May 1;33(5):919-923. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey051.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of maternal posture on fetal physiology in human pregnancy: a narrative review.母体姿势对人类孕期胎儿生理的影响:一项叙述性综述
Front Physiol. 2024 May 17;15:1394707. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1394707. eCollection 2024.
2
Predictive factors for intrauterine insemination outcomes: a review.宫腔内人工授精结局的预测因素:综述
Fertil Res Pract. 2020 Dec 11;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00092-1.