Berlin University of Technology, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Federal Joint Committee, Wegelystraße 8, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Oct 17;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0253-1.
This article examines the current status and most important changes over time to the legislative framework on the health technology assessment-informed decision-making process on diagnostic and therapeutic 'methods' in Germany. The relevant information was obtained through documentary analysis covering the period 1990 to 2017. The findings show that, even if the outpatient care sector appears to be much more regulated than the inpatient sector (based on a strict separation of the two care settings), developments in Germany have led to a more tightened assessment framework, making the use of evidence a firm component in the decision-making process. Nevertheless, a comprehensive approach for a systematic assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic 'methods' still does not exist. Readjustments of current regulations in Germany, such as the existing 'Verbotsvorbehalt' (i.e. provision of a diagnostic and therapeutic 'method' possible unless actively delisted) in the inpatient care setting, as well as further developments at the European level are needed in order to create a system that ensures early access to innovation under controlled study conditions.
本文考察了德国在卫生技术评估指导下的诊断和治疗“方法”决策过程的立法框架的现状和随时间推移的最重要变化。相关信息是通过涵盖 1990 年至 2017 年期间的文献分析获得的。研究结果表明,即使门诊护理部门看起来比住院部门受到更严格的监管(基于对两种护理环境的严格划分),德国的发展导致评估框架更加收紧,使证据的使用成为决策过程中的一个确定因素。然而,对于诊断和治疗“方法”的系统评估,仍然没有一个全面的方法。为了建立一个能够在受控研究条件下确保早期获得创新的系统,需要对德国现行法规进行调整,例如在住院护理环境中现有的“Verbotsvorbehalt”(即除非主动排除,否则提供诊断和治疗“方法”是可能的),以及在欧洲层面进一步发展。