Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Dec;74:111-114. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
The Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse is an example of a government response to survivors' demands to address the harm they suffered. It is also a major response by a national government to improve child safety in the future. Facing up to child abuse is difficult and in other countries similar inquiries have suffered delays and derailing. This commentary uses an evidence-to-action lens to explore why clear evidence of child sexual abuse may be ignored and side-lined. It argues that where evidence challenges the powerful, is surprising and shocking, or undercuts current institutional and policy arrangements, then that evidence is likely to be ignored, undermined or refuted - all factors which are present in the case of historical institutional child sexual abuse.
澳大利亚机构对儿童性虐待问题皇家委员会是政府回应幸存者要求解决其所遭受的伤害的一个范例。它也是国家政府为提高未来儿童安全而采取的一项重大举措。正视虐待儿童问题是困难的,在其他国家,类似的调查也遭遇了拖延和脱轨。本评论使用证据到行动的视角来探讨为什么明显的儿童性虐待证据可能被忽视和搁置。它认为,当证据挑战权威、令人惊讶和震惊,或者破坏当前的制度和政策安排时,那么该证据很可能被忽视、破坏或反驳——所有这些因素在历史上机构性儿童性虐待的情况下都存在。