Gounden Verena, Rampursat Yashna
Department of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Services, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, South Africa.
Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Afr J Lab Med. 2014 Oct 8;3(1):91. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v3i1.91. eCollection 2014.
It is common practice in most chemical pathology laboratories for reflective immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) to occur following the detection or suspicion of a paraprotein on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). The chemical pathology laboratory at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH) in Durban, South Africa, is currently the only non-private laboratory in the KwaZulu Natal province that performs SPEP analysis, with current practice requiring that the clinician request IFE following suggestion by the laboratory after a suspicious SPEP result.
To review the current process for IFE at IALCH in the context of reflective testing and to examine the use of the alpha-2-globulin/alpha-1-globulin ratio as a predictor of a positive IFE result.
Data for 1260 consecutive SPEP tests performed at the IALCH National Health Laboratory Service were collected between February and July 2011. SPEP and IFE were performed with a Sebia Hydrasys automated electrophoresis system. The alpha-2-globulin/alpha-1-globulin ratio was calculated using density of corresponding fractions on SPEP.
Analysis revealed that of the 1260 SPEPs performed during the analysis period, 304 IFEs were suggested by the reviewing pathologist. A total of 45 (15%) of the suggested IFEs were subsequently requested by the attending clinicians. Almost half (46.5%) ( = 20) of the suggested IFEs that were performed revealed the presence of a paraprotein. There was no statistically-significant difference between the alpha-2-globulin/alpha-1-globulin ratio for patients with positive or negative IFEs (-value = 0.2).
This study reveals the need for reflective addition of IFE testing by the laboratory following suspicious findings on SPEP.
在大多数化学病理学实验室中,血清蛋白电泳(SPEP)检测到或怀疑存在副蛋白后,进行反射性免疫固定电泳(IFE)是常见做法。南非德班的因科西·阿尔伯特·卢图利中心医院(IALCH)的化学病理学实验室是夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省目前唯一进行SPEP分析的非私立实验室,目前的做法是临床医生在实验室对可疑的SPEP结果提出建议后再申请IFE。
在反射性检测的背景下,回顾IALCH目前IFE的流程,并检查α-2球蛋白/α-1球蛋白比值作为IFE阳性结果预测指标的应用情况。
收集2011年2月至7月在IALCH国家卫生实验室服务中心进行的1260次连续SPEP检测的数据。使用Sebia Hydrasys自动电泳系统进行SPEP和IFE检测。根据SPEP上相应组分的密度计算α-2球蛋白/α-1球蛋白比值。
分析显示,在分析期间进行的1260次SPEP检测中,复审病理学家建议进行304次IFE检测。随后,主治临床医生共申请了45次(15%)建议的IFE检测。在已进行的建议IFE检测中,几乎一半(46.5%)(=20次)显示存在副蛋白。IFE阳性或阴性患者的α-2球蛋白/α-1球蛋白比值之间无统计学显著差异(P值=0.2)。
本研究表明,在SPEP出现可疑结果后,实验室需要进行反射性IFE检测。