Daveckaite Akvile, Grusauskiene Evelina, Petrikonis Kestutis, Vaitkus Antanas, Siaudvytyte Lina, Januleviciene Ingrida
Department of Ophthalmology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 50009, Lithuania.
Department of Neurology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 50009, Lithuania.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;65(10):974-978. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_756_16.
Only a few studies have analyzed the potential link between glaucoma and cognitive function impairment. They have found controversial results. This study aims to perform quick cognitive function assessment with clock drawing test (CDT) using two different scoring systems and compare between normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and cataract patients.
Totally, 30 NTG and 30 patients with cataracts were included in a prospective, pilot study. The predrawn circle was given, and patients were asked to draw the clock showing a time of 11:10. The test was evaluated using two methods - Freund method using a 7-point scoring scale (optimal cutoff ≤4) and Rakusa using a 4-point scoring scale (optimal cutoff ≤3). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
CDT result was significantly better in cataract group than in NTG group: 3.5 (2) versus 2 (2) by Freund, (P = 0.003) and 6.5 (1) versus 4.5 (2.75) by Rakusa, respectively (P = 0.004). Sixty percent (n = 18) of NTG group and 10% (n = 3) of cataract group patients completed the CDT in the specific picture manner (the short hand on 11 and the long hand between 11 and 12), (P = 0.001).
Lower CDT results were seen in NTG patients according to two different scoring systems. NTG patients showed a specific manner of drawing. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the CDT reliability as fast screening test of cognitive function impairment in glaucoma patients.
仅有少数研究分析了青光眼与认知功能损害之间的潜在联系,且结果存在争议。本研究旨在使用两种不同评分系统通过画钟试验(CDT)进行快速认知功能评估,并比较正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者和白内障患者。
一项前瞻性试点研究共纳入30例NTG患者和30例白内障患者。给患者提供预先画好的圆圈,要求他们画出显示11:10的时钟。使用两种方法评估该试验——采用7分制评分量表的弗罗因德方法(最佳截断值≤4)和采用4分制评分量表的拉库萨方法(最佳截断值≤3)。显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。
白内障组的CDT结果显著优于NTG组:弗罗因德方法分别为3.5(2)和2(2),(P = 0.003);拉库萨方法分别为6.5(1)和4.5(2.75),(P = 0.004)。NTG组60%(n = 18)的患者和白内障组10%(n = 3)的患者以特定的画图方式完成了CDT(短针指向11,长针在11和12之间),(P = 0.001)。
根据两种不同评分系统,NTG患者的CDT结果较低。NTG患者表现出一种特定的画图方式。需要进一步进行前瞻性研究,以调查CDT作为青光眼患者认知功能损害快速筛查试验的可靠性。