Wu C H, Gocial B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Int J Fertil. 1988 Sep-Oct;33(5):341-6.
A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery was devised in which pelvic pathology is assessed for comparative and prognostic purposes. Pelvic pathology was divided into three areas: adhesions (ADH), salpingitis (SPG), and tubal occlusion (TOC). The extent of pathology was scored as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), or extensive (4). The maximum scores for adhesions, salpingitis, and tubal occlusion were 48, 24, and 28, respectively--various weightings were applied and subareas accounted for. The pelvic score (PLV#) was simply the sum of the adhesions (ADH#), salpingitis (SPG#), and tubal occlusion (TOC#) scores. The stage of pelvic pathology was arbitrarily assigned as stage 0, I, II, III, and IV with PVL#'s of 0, 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, and 76-100, respectively. A close correlation (r = .960-.990) of PLV# was noted between different observers using this system. Poorer reproductive potential was observed in the patients with higher scores and stages. This scoring system properly reflects clinical experience and can be relied on for patient counseling via prediction of prognosis. This system can be utilized to compare objectively the results of infertility surgery between surgeons as well as among institutions.
