Lawrenson John G, Hull Christopher C, Downie Laura E
Centre for Applied Vision Research, Division of Optometry and Visual Science, City University of London, London, UK.
Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Nov;37(6):644-654. doi: 10.1111/opo.12406.
Blue-blocking (BB) spectacle lenses, which attenuate short-wavelength light, are being marketed to alleviate eyestrain and discomfort when using digital devices, improve sleep quality and potentially confer protection from retinal phototoxicity. The aim of this review was to investigate the relative benefits and potential harms of these lenses.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), recruiting adults from the general population, which investigated the effect of BB spectacle lenses on visual performance, symptoms of eyestrain or eye fatigue, changes to macular integrity and subjective sleep quality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and clinical trial registers, until 30 April 2017. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.
Three studies (with 136 participants) met our inclusion criteria; these had limitations in study design and/or implementation. One study compared the effect of BB lenses with clear lenses on contrast sensitivity (CS) and colour vision (CV) using a pseudo-RCT crossover design; there was no observed difference between lens types (log CS; Mean Difference (MD) = -0.01 [-0.03, 0.01], CV total error score on 100-hue; MD = 1.30 [-7.84, 10.44]). Another study measured critical fusion frequency (CFF), as a proxy for eye fatigue, on wearers of low and high BB lenses, pre- and post- a two-hour computer task. There was no observed difference between low BB and standard lens groups, but there was a less negative change in CFF between the high and low BB groups (MD = 1.81 [0.57, 3.05]). Both studies compared eyestrain symptoms with Likert scales. There was no evidence of inter-group differences for either low BB (MD = 0.00 [-0.22, 0.22]) or high BB lenses (MD = -0.05 [-0.31, 0.21]), nor evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants showing an improvement in symptoms of eyestrain or eye fatigue. One study reported a small improvement in sleep quality in people with self-reported insomnia after wearing high compared to low-BB lenses (MD = 0.80 [0.17, 1.43]) using a 10-point Likert scale. A study involving normal participants found no observed difference in sleep quality. We found no studies investigating effects on macular structure or function.
We find a lack of high quality evidence to support using BB spectacle lenses for the general population to improve visual performance or sleep quality, alleviate eye fatigue or conserve macular health.
蓝光阻断(BB)眼镜镜片可衰减短波长光,目前正在市场上销售,旨在减轻使用数字设备时的眼睛疲劳和不适,改善睡眠质量,并可能提供视网膜光毒性防护。本综述的目的是研究这些镜片的相对益处和潜在危害。
我们纳入了从普通人群中招募成年人的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验研究了BB眼镜镜片对视觉性能、眼睛疲劳症状、黄斑完整性变化和主观睡眠质量的影响。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和临床试验注册库,检索截止至2017年4月30日。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。
三项研究(共136名参与者)符合我们的纳入标准;这些研究在研究设计和/或实施方面存在局限性。一项研究采用伪随机对照交叉设计比较了BB镜片与透明镜片对对比敏感度(CS)和色觉(CV)的影响;未观察到镜片类型之间的差异(对数CS;平均差(MD)=-0.01[-0.03,0.01],100色调上的CV总误差评分;MD=1.30[-7.84,10.44])。另一项研究在两项为期两小时的计算机任务前后,测量了低BB镜片和高BB镜片佩戴者的临界融合频率(CFF),以此作为眼睛疲劳的指标。低BB镜片组和标准镜片组之间未观察到差异,但高BB镜片组和低BB镜片组之间CFF的负向变化较小(MD=1.81[0.57,3.05])。两项研究均使用李克特量表比较了眼睛疲劳症状。没有证据表明低BB镜片组(MD=0.00[-0.22,0.22])或高BB镜片组(MD=-0.05[-0.31,0.21])存在组间差异,也没有证据表明在眼睛疲劳症状有所改善的参与者比例上存在差异。一项研究报告称,与低BB镜片相比,自我报告患有失眠症的人佩戴高BB镜片后睡眠质量有小幅改善(MD=0.80[0.17,1.43]),使用的是10分量表。一项涉及正常参与者的研究未观察到睡眠质量存在差异。我们未发现研究对黄斑结构或功能影响的相关研究。
我们发现缺乏高质量证据支持普通人群使用BB眼镜镜片来改善视觉性能或睡眠质量、减轻眼睛疲劳或保护黄斑健康。