• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的细胞学分化评估:一项多机构研究。

Assessment of cytologic differentiation in high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multi-institutional study.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Jan;126(1):44-53. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21934. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1002/cncy.21934
PMID:29044913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5766365/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Well-differentiated (WD) and poorly differentiated (PD) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are biologically distinct entities with different therapies and prognoses. WD neoplasms with elevated proliferation (Ki-67 > 20%) have been shown to have an overlapping histology with PD neuroendocrine carcinomas. This study compared expert cytomorphologic assessments of differentiation in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in a multi-institutional study.

METHODS

Fine-needle aspiration specimens from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (grade 2 [G2] and grade 3 [G3] according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification; n = 72) were diagnosed independently by 3 cytopathologists as WD or PD (poorly differentiated large cell type [PD-L] or poorly differentiated small cell type [PD-S]) purely on the basis of cytomorphology. Their diagnoses were compared with a final classification supported by immunohistochemistry (retinoblastoma (RB), death domain- associated protein (DAXX), and α thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) protein expression), targeted mutation analysis (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), prior history of G1/G2 histology, and consensus.

RESULTS

The rate of agreement on differentiation was 38% (15 WD cases and 12 PD cases) for the 70 cases included (55 WD cases [n = 19 G2, n = 31 G3, and n = 5 could not be graded] and 15 PD cases [n = 6 PD-S, n = 6 PD-L, and n = 3 PD, not otherwise specified). Two cases could not be classified by the employed methods. PD carcinomas had a higher rate of agreement (10 of 15 [67%]) than WD neoplasms (15 of 55 [27%]). Round nuclei and plasmacytoid cells were associated with agreement for WD cases, whereas apoptosis and angulated nuclei were associated with disagreement. Necrosis was associated with agreement for PD cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A purely morphologic approach to the distinction between G2 and G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms based on cytology can be challenging, with disagreement found among experienced cytopathologists. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:44-53. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

高分化(WD)和低分化(PD)胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤是具有不同治疗方法和预后的生物学实体。Ki-67 增殖指数>20%的 WD 肿瘤已被证明与 PD 神经内分泌癌具有重叠的组织学特征。本研究比较了多机构研究中胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的专家细胞形态学分化评估。

方法

根据 2017 年世界卫生组织分类,对 72 例胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(2 级[G2]和 3 级[G3])的细针抽吸标本进行独立诊断,由 3 位细胞病理学家根据细胞形态学单纯诊断为 WD 或 PD(分化不良的大细胞型[PD-L]或分化不良的小细胞型[PD-S])。他们的诊断与免疫组织化学(视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)、死亡结构域相关蛋白(DAXX)和α地中海贫血/智力迟钝综合征 X 连锁(ATRX)蛋白表达)、靶向突变分析(纪念斯隆凯特琳综合可操作癌症靶点突变分析)、先前的 G1/G2 组织学病史和共识支持的最终分类进行比较。

结果

在纳入的 70 例病例中(55 例 WD 病例[包括 19 例 G2、31 例 G3 和 5 例无法分级]和 15 例 PD 病例[包括 6 例 PD-S、6 例 PD-L 和 3 例 PD,其他未指定]),分化的一致性率为 38%(15 例 WD 病例和 12 例 PD 病例)。有 2 例无法用所采用的方法进行分类。PD 癌的一致性率(15 例中的 10 例[67%])高于 WD 肿瘤(55 例中的 15 例[27%])。圆形核和浆细胞样细胞与 WD 病例的一致性有关,而凋亡和角状核与不一致性有关。坏死与 PD 病例的一致性有关。

结论

根据细胞学,单纯采用形态学方法区分 G2 和 G3 胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤具有挑战性,经验丰富的细胞病理学家之间存在分歧。癌症细胞病理学 2018;126:44-53。© 2017 美国癌症协会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11a1/5766365/5e98990203e9/nihms908063f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11a1/5766365/70621bd8762c/nihms908063f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11a1/5766365/5e98990203e9/nihms908063f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11a1/5766365/70621bd8762c/nihms908063f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11a1/5766365/5e98990203e9/nihms908063f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of cytologic differentiation in high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multi-institutional study.高级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的细胞学分化评估:一项多机构研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Jan;126(1):44-53. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21934. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
2
Well differentiated grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors compared with related neoplasms: A morphologic study.分化良好的 3 级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与相关肿瘤的比较:形态学研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 May;126(5):326-335. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21982. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
A Practical Approach to the Classification of WHO Grade 3 (G3) Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor (WD-NET) and Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (PD-NEC) of the Pancreas.胰腺WHO 3级(G3)高分化神经内分泌肿瘤(WD-NET)和低分化神经内分泌癌(PD-NEC)分类的实用方法
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Sep;40(9):1192-202. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000662.
4
[Accurate grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 index in fine-needle aspiration specimens: a comparative cytologic and histologic study].[细针穿刺标本中Ki-67指数对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的准确分级:一项细胞学与组织学对比研究]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 8;46(6):393-399. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2017.06.006.
5
Cytology assessment can predict survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.细胞学评估可预测转移性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者的生存率。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Mar;125(3):188-196. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21817. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
Improving fine needle aspiration to predict the tumor biological aggressiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors using Ki-67 proliferation index, phosphorylated histone H3 (PHH3), and BCL-2.利用 Ki-67 增殖指数、磷酸化组蛋白 H3(PHH3)和 BCL-2 提高细针抽吸术对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤肿瘤生物学侵袭性的预测能力。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2023 Aug;65:152149. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2023.152149. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
7
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: accurate grading with Ki-67 index on fine-needle aspiration specimens using the WHO 2010/ENETS criteria.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:使用 WHO 2010/ENETS 标准,通过细针穿刺标本中的 Ki-67 指数进行准确分级。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Oct;122(10):770-8. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21457. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE).神经内分泌肿瘤异质性给 2010 年世界卫生组织分类带来不确定性:来自西班牙肿瘤登记处(R-GETNE)的真实世界数据。
Oncologist. 2018 Apr;23(4):422-432. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0364. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Reliability of Ki-67 Determination in FNA Samples for Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)样本中Ki-67测定在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤分级中的可靠性
Endocr Pathol. 2016 Dec;27(4):276-283. doi: 10.1007/s12022-016-9455-2.
10
Pancreatic High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in the Korean Population: A Multicenter Study.韩国人群胰腺高级别神经内分泌肿瘤:一项多中心研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):263-276. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.192. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of assessing morphologic features with prognostic significance in cytology specimens of epithelioid diffuse pleural mesothelioma and implications for cytopathology reporting.评估上皮样弥漫性胸膜间皮瘤细胞学标本中具有预后意义的形态学特征的可靠性及其对细胞病理学报告的影响。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Aug;131(8):495-506. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22705. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
Background features in the cytology of pancreatic neoplasms.胰腺肿瘤细胞学的背景特征。
DEN Open. 2022 Mar 23;2(1):e105. doi: 10.1002/deo2.105. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Insights into Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

本文引用的文献

1
Cytology assessment can predict survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.细胞学评估可预测转移性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者的生存率。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Mar;125(3):188-196. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21817. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
2
Treatment Response and Outcomes of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Based on Morphology: Well Differentiated Versus Poorly Differentiated.基于形态学的3级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的治疗反应和结果:高分化与低分化
Pancreas. 2017 Mar;46(3):296-301. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000735.
3
A Practical Approach to the Classification of WHO Grade 3 (G3) Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor (WD-NET) and Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (PD-NEC) of the Pancreas.
神经内分泌肿瘤发生机制的研究进展。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 25;22(19):10328. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910328.
4
Biomarkers of Response to Etoposide-Platinum Chemotherapy in Patients with Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.3级神经内分泌肿瘤患者对依托泊苷-铂类化疗反应的生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 5;13(4):643. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040643.
5
Diagnostic and Predictive Role of DLL3 Expression in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.DLL3 表达在胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤中的诊断和预测作用。
Endocr Pathol. 2021 Jun;32(2):309-317. doi: 10.1007/s12022-020-09657-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Genetic analysis of the cooperative tumorigenic effects of targeted deletions of tumor suppressors , , , and in neuroendocrine tumors in mice.对小鼠神经内分泌肿瘤中肿瘤抑制因子、、、和靶向缺失的协同致瘤作用的遗传分析。
Oncotarget. 2020 Jul 14;11(28):2718-2739. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27660.
7
Multimodality management, recurrence patterns, and long-term outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Progress over 17 years.胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤的多模式管理、复发模式及长期预后:17年进展
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct;38(5):399-410. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00957-4. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Well differentiated grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors compared with related neoplasms: A morphologic study.分化良好的 3 级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与相关肿瘤的比较:形态学研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 May;126(5):326-335. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21982. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
胰腺WHO 3级(G3)高分化神经内分泌肿瘤(WD-NET)和低分化神经内分泌癌(PD-NEC)分类的实用方法
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Sep;40(9):1192-202. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000662.
4
Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors with a Morphologically Apparent High-Grade Component: A Pathway Distinct from Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.具有形态学上明显高级别成分的高分化神经内分泌肿瘤:一条与低分化神经内分泌癌不同的途径。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 15;22(4):1011-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0548. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology.纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心可操作癌症靶点综合突变分析(MSK-IMPACT):一种基于杂交捕获的实体瘤分子肿瘤学新一代测序临床检测方法。
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
6
The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.高级别(世界卫生组织G3级)胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤类别在形态学和生物学上具有异质性,包括高分化和低分化肿瘤。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 May;39(5):683-90. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000408.
7
Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic analysis of 44 cases.胰腺低分化神经内分泌癌:44 例临床病理分析。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Apr;38(4):437-47. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000169.
8
Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.胰腺的小细胞神经内分泌癌和大细胞神经内分泌癌在遗传上相似,但与分化良好的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤不同。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Feb;36(2):173-84. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182417d36.
9
DAXX/ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.DAXX/ATRX、MEN1 和 mTOR 通路基因在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤中经常发生改变。
Science. 2011 Mar 4;331(6021):1199-203. doi: 10.1126/science.1200609. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
10
Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms.依托泊苷和顺铂联合治疗神经内分泌癌。这些肿瘤间变性变体具有主要治疗活性的证据。
Cancer. 1991 Jul 15;68(2):227-32. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910715)68:2<227::aid-cncr2820680202>3.0.co;2-i.