Mascarenhas Diego C, Gomes Karina S, Sorregotti Tatiani, Nunes-de-Souza Ricardo L
Joint Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos and São Paulo State University, São Carlos, Brazil.
Laboratory of Neuropsychopharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, Brazil.
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Oct 4;8:695. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00695. eCollection 2017.
Divergent results in pain management account for the growing number of studies aiming at elucidating the pharmacology of the endocannabinoid/endovanilloid anandamide (AEA) within several pain-related brain structures. For instance, the stimulation of both Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) and Cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors led to paradoxical effects on nociception. Here, we attempted to propose a clear and reproducible methodology to achieve the antinociceptive effect of exogenous AEA within the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) of mice exposed to the tail-flick test. Accordingly, male Swiss mice received intra-dPAG injection of AEA (CB1/TRPV1 agonist), capsaicin (TRPV1 agonist), WIN (CB1 agonist), AM251 (CB1 antagonist), and 6-iodonordihydrocapsaicin (6-IODO) (TRPV1 selective antagonist) and their nociceptive response was assessed with the tail-flick test. In order to assess AEA effects on nociception specifically at vanilloid or cannabinoid (CB) substrates into the dPAG, mice underwent an intrinsically inactive dose of AM251 or 6-IODO followed by local AEA injections and were subjected to the same test. While intra-dPAG AEA did not change acute pain, local injections of capsaicin or WIN induced a marked TRPV1- and CB1-dependent antinociceptive effect, respectively. Regarding the role of AEA specifically at CB/vanilloid substrates, while the blockade of TRPV1 did not change the lack of effects of intra-dPAG AEA on nociception, local pre-treatment of AM251, a CB1 antagonist, led to a clear AEA-induced antinociception. It seems that the exogenous AEA-induced antinociception is unmasked when it selectively binds to vanilloid substrates, which might be useful to address acute pain in basic and perhaps clinical trials.
疼痛管理方面的不同结果导致越来越多的研究旨在阐明内源性大麻素/内源性香草素类花生四烯酸乙醇胺(AEA)在多个与疼痛相关的脑结构中的药理学特性。例如,对瞬时受体电位香草酸亚型1(TRPV1)和大麻素1型(CB1)受体的刺激均对伤害感受产生了矛盾的影响。在此,我们试图提出一种清晰且可重复的方法,以在接受甩尾试验的小鼠的背侧导水管周围灰质(dPAG)中实现外源性AEA的抗伤害感受作用。相应地,雄性瑞士小鼠接受了dPAG内注射AEA(CB1/TRPV1激动剂)、辣椒素(TRPV1激动剂)、WIN(CB1激动剂)、AM251(CB1拮抗剂)和6-碘去甲二氢辣椒素(6-IODO)(TRPV1选择性拮抗剂),并通过甩尾试验评估它们的伤害感受反应。为了特别评估AEA对dPAG中香草素或大麻素(CB)底物上伤害感受的影响,小鼠先接受了无活性剂量的AM251或6-IODO,随后进行局部AEA注射,并接受相同的试验。虽然dPAG内注射AEA并未改变急性疼痛,但局部注射辣椒素或WIN分别诱导了明显的TRPV1依赖性和CB1依赖性抗伤害感受作用。关于AEA在CB/香草素底物上的具体作用,虽然TRPV1的阻断并未改变dPAG内注射AEA对伤害感受缺乏影响的情况,但CB1拮抗剂AM251的局部预处理导致了明显的AEA诱导的抗伤害感受作用。似乎当外源性AEA选择性地与香草素底物结合时,其诱导的抗伤害感受作用就会显现出来,这可能有助于在基础研究以及或许在临床试验中解决急性疼痛问题。