Subsomwong Phawinee, Miftahussurur Muhammad, Vilaichone Ratha-Korn, Ratanachu-Ek Thawee, Suzuki Rumiko, Akada Junko, Uchida Tomohisa, Mahachai Varocha, Yamaoka Yoshio
Department of Environment and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita 879-5593 Japan.
Gastroentero-Hepatology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine-Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 60115 Indonesia.
Gut Pathog. 2017 Oct 11;9:56. doi: 10.1186/s13099-017-0205-x. eCollection 2017.
There are few studies analyzed concurrently the prevalence and genotypes of infection with the ancestor origins from different ethnics, especially with including minority groups. We recruited a total of 289 patients in MaeSot, Thailand (154 Thai, 14 Thai-Chinese, 29 Karen and 92 Hmong ethnics). The virulence genes and genealogy of the strains were determined by PCR-based sequencing.
Based on culture and histology/immunohistochemistry, the prevalence of infection was 54.5% (158/289). Among 152 isolates cultured, the East-Asian-type was predominant genotype among strains from Hmong, Thai-Chinese and Thai (96.0% [48/50], 85.7% [6/7] and 62.7% [47/75], respectively), whilst majority of strains from Karen had Western-type (73.3% [11/15]). Patients infected with the East-Asian-type strains had significantly higher activity and intestinal metaplasia in the antrum and activity in the corpus than those with Western-type ( = 0.024, 0.006 and 0.005, respectively). The multilocus sequencing typing analysis discriminated that most strains from Hmong and Thai-Chinese belonged to hspEAsia (92.0 and 85.7%, respectively), whereas strains from Karen predominantly possessed hpAsia2 (86.7%) and strains from Thai were classified into hspEAsia (45.2%) and hpAsia2 (31.1%).
genotypes were relatively different among ethnic groups in Thailand and were associated with the source of ancestor even living in a small rural town. Caution and careful check-up are required especially on Hmong ethnic associated with high prevalence of virulence genotypes of .
很少有研究同时分析来自不同种族(尤其是包括少数民族群体)的祖先起源感染的患病率和基因型。我们在泰国美索总共招募了289名患者(154名泰国人、14名泰籍华人、29名克伦族和92名苗族)。通过基于PCR的测序确定菌株的毒力基因和谱系。
基于培养和组织学/免疫组织化学,感染患病率为54.5%(158/289)。在培养的152株分离株中,东亚型在苗族、泰籍华人和泰国人菌株中占主导基因型(分别为96.0%[48/50]、85.7%[6/7]和62.7%[47/75]),而克伦族的大多数菌株具有西方型(73.3%[11/15])。感染东亚型菌株的患者胃窦部活性和肠化生以及胃体部活性显著高于感染西方型菌株的患者(分别为P = 0.024、0.006和0.005)。多位点测序分型分析表明,大多数苗族和泰籍华人菌株属于hspEAsia(分别为92.0%和85.7%),而克伦族菌株主要具有hpAsia2(86.7%),泰国人菌株分为hspEAsia(45.2%)和hpAsia2(31.1%)。
泰国不同种族之间的基因型相对不同,并且与祖先来源相关,即使生活在一个小乡村城镇。尤其对于与毒力基因型高患病率相关的苗族,需要谨慎并仔细检查。