Makishima Hirokazu, Ishikawa Hitoshi, Tanaka Keiichi, Mori Yutaro, Mizumoto Masashi, Ohnishi Kayoko, Aihara Teruhito, Fukumitsu Nobuyoshi, Okumura Toshiyuki, Sakurai Hideyuki
Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;7(4):547-552. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1372. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
The efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) were retrospectively evaluated in 111 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent definitive PBT between 2008 and 2012. Following exclusion of 18 patients due to treatment suspension, loss to follow-up, and histology, the analysis included 93 patients with a median age of 68 years (range, 49-81 years). A total of 7, 32 and 54 prostate cancer patients were classified as low-, intermediate- and high-risk, respectively, as follows: High-risk, T≥3a or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥20 ng/ml or Gleason Score ≥8; low-risk, T ≤2b and PSA≤10 ng/ml and Gleason Score=6; intermediate-risk, all other combinations. The median initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 9.75 ng/ml (range, 1.4-100 ng/ml) and the median Gleason score was 7 (range, 6-10). Patients with low-risk disease received 74 GyE (relative biological effectiveness=1.1) in 37 fractions, and those at intermediate or higher risk received 78 GyE in 39 fractions. Complete androgen blockade (CAB) therapy was performed from 6 months prior to PBT for patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease. CAB was continued during PBT and then terminated at the end of PBT for intermediate-risk patients. Patients at high risk continued CAB for 3 years. No combination therapy was used for low-risk patients. All the patients were followed up for >2 years after PBT, and all but one were PSA failure-free. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0 was used to evaluate late adverse events. One patient developed grade 3 non-infectious cystitis and hematuria. Grade 2 urinary frequency was observed in 1 patient, and grade 2 rectal bleeding occurred in 4 patients. Of the 4 patients with grade 2 rectal bleeding, 2 received anticoagulant therapy, but none had diabetes mellitus or another high-risk comorbidity. The median time to occurrence of an adverse event of grade ≥2 was 14 months (range, 3-41 months). Therefore, the present retrospective study revealed that PBT at 78 GyE/39 Fr was well-tolerated and achieved good tumor control in patients with prostate cancer.
回顾性评估了2008年至2012年间连续111例接受根治性质子束治疗(PBT)的前列腺癌患者的PBT疗效和安全性。在排除18例因治疗中止、失访和组织学原因的患者后,分析纳入了93例患者,中位年龄为68岁(范围49 - 81岁)。共有7例、32例和54例前列腺癌患者分别被分类为低、中、高危,分类如下:高危,T≥3a或前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)≥20 ng/ml或Gleason评分≥8;低危,T≤2b且PSA≤10 ng/ml且Gleason评分为6;中危,所有其他组合。初始前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平的中位数为9.75 ng/ml(范围1.4 - 100 ng/ml),Gleason评分中位数为7(范围6 - 10)。低危疾病患者接受37次分割的74 GyE(相对生物效应=1.1),中危或高危患者接受39次分割的78 GyE。对于中危或高危疾病患者,在PBT前6个月开始进行全雄激素阻断(CAB)治疗。中危患者在PBT期间继续进行CAB,然后在PBT结束时终止。高危患者继续CAB治疗3年。低危患者未使用联合治疗。所有患者在PBT后随访超过2年,除1例患者外均无PSA失败。采用不良事件通用术语标准第4.0版评估晚期不良事件。1例患者发生3级非感染性膀胱炎和血尿。1例患者出现2级尿频,4例患者出现2级直肠出血。在4例2级直肠出血患者中,2例接受了抗凝治疗,但均无糖尿病或其他高危合并症。≥2级不良事件发生的中位时间为14个月(范围3 - 41个月)。因此,本回顾性研究表明,78 GyE/39 Fr的PBT耐受性良好,在前列腺癌患者中实现了良好的肿瘤控制。