Seto Ichiro, Yamaguchi Hisashi, Takagawa Yoshiaki, Azami Yusuke, Takayama Kanako, Suzuki Motohisa, Machida Masanori, Dai Yuntao, Sulaiman Nor Shazrina Binti, Kikuchi Yasuhiro, Kato Takahiro, Nishino Noriyuki, Teranishi Yasushi, Murakami Masao
Departments of Radiation Oncology.
Radiation Physics and Technology.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 2;9(10):101577. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101577. eCollection 2024 Oct.
We retrospectively researched the treatment outcome of proton beam therapy (PBT) and assessed its efficacy for inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at our institution.
Fifty-four patients (28 men and 26 women, median age 67 years ranging from 40-88 years) were diagnosed with unresectable stage III LAPC and administered PBT from April 2009 to March 2020. Patients who could not complete PBT, had new distant metastases during the treatment, or did not have enough follow-up time were excluded from this study. All patients were clinically staged based on the International Union of Cancer TNM staging system (eighth edition) using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography and were diagnosed as stage III (histologic type: 18 patients with adenocarcinoma and 36 clinically diagnosed patients). PBT was performed using the passive method, with a median total dose of 67.5 GyE (range, 50-77 GyE/25-35 fractions).Chemotherapy was used in combination during PBT in 46 patients (85.2%). Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival, and median OS time were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following factors: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (PS), tumor site, total irradiation dose, concurrent chemotherapy, and primary tumor site. Cutoff values for SUVmax and tumor diameter were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve based on OS. Multivariate analysis was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models. Adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
The median observation period was 17.4 months, ranging from 4.0 to 89.7 months. The median tumor diameter was 36.5 mm, ranging from 15 to 90 mm, the median SUVmax was 5.85 (range, 2.1-27.6), and their cutoff values were estimated to be 37 mm and 4.8 mm, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS was 77.8% and 35.2%, respectively, with a median OS time of 18.2 months, and only one patient survived >5 years. Twelve patients (22.2%) developed local recurrence, and 1- and 2-year LPFS rates were 89.7% and 74.5%, respectively; progression-free survival at 1 year was 58.8%. The PS score, tumor site, and irradiation dose were the prognostic factors related to OS that showed a significant difference. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in factors involved in LPFS, at 96.7%/77.9% in the first year and 86.6%/54.4% in the second year in the groups with tumor dose ≥67.5 GyE and <67.5 GyE, respectively ( = .015). Treatment-related acute toxicities were neutropenia (grade 1/2/3 at 3.7%/11.1%/31.5%, respectively), leukopenia (grade 1/2/3 at 1.8%/7.4%/20.4%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1/2 at 1.8%/7.4%, respectively), whereas the late effects including peptic ulcer were captured only grade 2+. The late adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed.
PBT achieving 67.5 Gy combined with standard chemotherapy showed excellent local control for unresectable LAPC. Total irradiation dose, tumor site, and PS score at an initial diagnosis could be important prognostic factors. In this study, the dose-effect relationship was found, so an increase in dose should be considered to improve prognosis.
我们回顾性研究了质子束治疗(PBT)的治疗结果,并评估了其在我们机构对无法手术切除的局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的疗效。
2009年4月至2020年3月期间,54例患者(28例男性和26例女性,中位年龄67岁,年龄范围40 - 88岁)被诊断为无法切除的III期LAPC并接受了PBT治疗。无法完成PBT、在治疗期间出现新的远处转移或随访时间不足的患者被排除在本研究之外。所有患者均根据国际癌症联盟TNM分期系统(第八版),使用计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描进行临床分期,并被诊断为III期(组织学类型:18例腺癌患者和36例临床诊断患者)。PBT采用被动方法进行,中位总剂量为67.5 GyE(范围,50 - 77 GyE/25 - 35次分割)。46例患者(85.2%)在PBT期间联合使用了化疗。通过Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验分析总生存期(OS)、局部无进展生存期(LPFS)、无进展生存期和中位OS时间。对以下因素进行单因素和多因素分析:最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(PS)、肿瘤部位、总照射剂量、同步化疗和原发肿瘤部位。基于OS,使用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积估计SUVmax和肿瘤直径的截断值。使用Cox比例风险模型评估多因素分析。使用美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准第5.0版评估不良事件。
中位观察期为17.4个月,范围为4.0至89.7个月。中位肿瘤直径为36.5 mm,范围为15至90 mm,中位SUVmax为5.85(范围,2.1 - 27.6),其截断值分别估计为37 mm和4.8 mm。1年和2年OS分别为77.8%和35.2%,中位OS时间为18.2个月,只有1例患者存活超过5年。12例患者(22.2%)发生局部复发,1年和2年LPFS率分别为89.7%和74.5%;1年无进展生存期为58.8%。PS评分、肿瘤部位和照射剂量是与OS相关的预后因素,差异有统计学意义。另一方面,LPFS相关因素存在显著差异,肿瘤剂量≥67.5 GyE组和<67.5 GyE组在第一年分别为96.7%/77.9%,第二年分别为86.6%/54.4%(P = 0.015)。治疗相关的急性毒性反应为中性粒细胞减少(1/2/3级分别为3.7%/11.1%/31.5%)、白细胞减少(1/2/3级分别为1.8%/7.4%/20.4%)和血小板减少(1/2级分别为1.8%/7.4%),而包括消化性溃疡在内的晚期效应仅记录到2级及以上。未观察到3级或更高等级的晚期不良事件。
PBT联合标准化疗达到67.5 Gy对无法切除的LAPC显示出良好的局部控制。初始诊断时的总照射剂量、肿瘤部位和PS评分可能是重要的预后因素。在本研究中发现了剂量效应关系,因此应考虑增加剂量以改善预后。