• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

iTACTIC——实施创伤性凝血病纠正治疗算法:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

iTACTIC - implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Baksaas-Aasen Kjersti, Gall Lewis, Eaglestone Simon, Rourke Claire, Juffermans Nicole P, Goslings J Carel, Naess Paal Aksel, van Dieren Susan, Ostrowski Sisse Rye, Stensballe Jakob, Maegele Marc, Stanworth Simon J, Gaarder Christine, Brohi Karim, Johansson Per I

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Oct 18;18(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2224-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2224-9
PMID:29047413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5648415/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury is the fourth leading cause of death globally. Half of all trauma deaths are due to bleeding and most of these will occur within 6 h of injury. Haemorrhagic shock following injury has been shown to induce a clotting dysfunction within minutes, and this early trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) may exacerbate bleeding and is associated with higher mortality and morbidity. In spite of improved resuscitation strategies over the last decade, current transfusion therapy still fails to correct TIC during ongoing haemorrhage and evidence for the optimal management of bleeding trauma patients is lacking. Recent publications describe increasing the use of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHAs) in trauma haemorrhage; however, there is insufficient evidence to support their superiority to conventional coagulation tests (CCTs).

METHODS/DESIGN: This multicentre, randomised controlled study will compare the haemostatic effect of an evidence-based VHA-guided versus an optimised CCT-guided transfusion algorithm in haemorrhaging trauma patients. A total of 392 adult trauma patients will be enrolled at major trauma centres. Participants will be eligible if they present with clinical signs of haemorrhagic shock, activate the local massive haemorrhage protocol and initiate first blood transfusion. Enrolled patients will be block randomised per centre to either VHA-guided or CCT-guided transfusion therapy in addition to that therapy delivered as part of standard care, until haemostasis is achieved. Patients will be followed until discharge or 28 days. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects alive and free of massive transfusion (less than 10 units of red blood cells) at 24 h. Secondary outcomes include the effect of CCT- versus VHA-guided therapy on organ failure, total hospital and intensive care lengths of stay, health care resources needed and mortality. Surviving patients will be asked to complete a quality of life questionnaire (EuroQol EQ-5D) at day 90.

DISCUSSION

CCTs have traditionally been used to detect TIC and monitor response to treatment in traumatic major haemorrhage. The use of VHAs is increasing, but limited evidence exists to support the superiority of these technologies (or comparatively) for patient-centred outcomes. This knowledge gap will be addressed by this trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02593877 . Registered on 15 October 2015. Trial sponsor Queen Mary University of London The contact person of the above sponsor organisation is: Dr. Sally Burtles, Director of Research Services and Business Development, Joint Research Management Office, QM Innovation Building, 5 Walden Street, London E1 2EF; phone: 020 7882 7260; Email: sponsorsrep@bartshealth.nhs.uk Trial sites Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Cologne, Germany Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen University Hospital), Copenhagen, Denmark John Radcliff Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Sites that are planning to start recruitment in mid/late 2017 Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom University of Kansas Hospital (UKH), Kansas City, MO, USA Protocol version: 3.0/14.03.2017 (Additional file 1).

摘要

背景

创伤性损伤是全球第四大死因。所有创伤死亡病例中有一半是由于出血,其中大多数将在受伤后6小时内发生。受伤后的失血性休克已被证明在几分钟内就会引发凝血功能障碍,这种早期创伤性凝血病(TIC)可能会加剧出血,并与更高的死亡率和发病率相关。尽管在过去十年中复苏策略有所改进,但目前的输血治疗在持续出血期间仍无法纠正TIC,并且缺乏针对出血性创伤患者最佳管理的证据。最近的出版物描述了在创伤性出血中增加使用粘弹性止血检测(VHA);然而,没有足够的证据支持其优于传统凝血试验(CCT)。

方法/设计:这项多中心随机对照研究将比较基于证据的VHA指导与优化的CCT指导的输血算法在出血性创伤患者中的止血效果。共有392名成年创伤患者将在主要创伤中心入组。如果参与者出现失血性休克的临床体征、启动当地大规模出血方案并开始首次输血,则符合入选条件。入组患者将在每个中心进行区组随机分组,接受VHA指导或CCT指导的输血治疗,此外还将接受作为标准治疗一部分提供的治疗,直至实现止血。患者将被随访至出院或28天。主要终点是24小时时存活且未接受大量输血(少于10单位红细胞)的受试者比例。次要结局包括CCT指导与VHA指导治疗对器官衰竭、总住院时间和重症监护住院时间、所需医疗资源和死亡率的影响。存活患者将被要求在第90天完成一份生活质量问卷(欧洲五维度健康量表EQ-5D)。

讨论

传统上,CCT一直用于检测TIC并监测创伤性大出血的治疗反应。VHA的使用正在增加,但支持这些技术(或相对而言)在以患者为中心的结局方面具有优越性的证据有限。本试验将填补这一知识空白。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT02593877。于2015年10月15日注册。试验主办方:伦敦玛丽女王大学 上述主办方组织的联系人是:研究服务与业务发展主任Sally Burtles博士,联合研究管理办公室,QM创新大楼,伦敦沃尔登街5号,E1 2EF;电话:020 7882 7260;电子邮件:sponsorsrep@bartshealth.nhs.uk 试验地点 荷兰阿姆斯特丹学术医疗中心 德国科隆市立医院有限公司,科隆,德国 丹麦哥本哈根大学医院里格医院 英国牛津约翰·拉德克利夫医院 挪威奥斯陆大学医院,奥斯陆 英国伦敦皇家伦敦医院 英国伦敦玛丽女王大学布莱兹研究所创伤科学中心 英国牛津大学纳菲尔德人口健康系卫生经济研究中心 计划于2017年年中/年末开始招募的地点 英国诺丁汉大学医院女王医疗中心,诺丁汉 美国密苏里州堪萨斯城堪萨斯大学医院(UKH) 方案版本:3.0/2017年3月14日(补充文件1)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/b1fe05c2a8cc/13063_2017_2224_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/4935526a8245/13063_2017_2224_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/6d4792a67f9d/13063_2017_2224_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/b1fe05c2a8cc/13063_2017_2224_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/4935526a8245/13063_2017_2224_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/6d4792a67f9d/13063_2017_2224_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af09/5648415/b1fe05c2a8cc/13063_2017_2224_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
iTACTIC - implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.iTACTIC——实施创伤性凝血病纠正治疗算法:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 18;18(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2224-9.
2
Haemotherapy algorithm for the management of trauma-induced coagulopathy: an Australian perspective.创伤性凝血病管理的血液疗法算法:澳大利亚视角
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;30(2):265-276. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000447.
3
Diversity in clinical management and protocols for the treatment of major bleeding trauma patients across European level I Trauma Centres.欧洲一级创伤中心对严重出血创伤患者的临床管理和治疗方案存在差异。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 1;23:74. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0147-6.
4
Prehospital use of plasma in traumatic hemorrhage (The PUPTH Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.创伤性出血院前使用血浆(PUPTH试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 30;16:321. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0844-5.
5
Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): a randomized, controlled trial.黏弹性止血检测增强方案治疗创伤大出血(ITACTIC):一项随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;47(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06266-1. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
6
Evaluation of TEG(®) and RoTEM(®) inter-changeability in trauma patients.评价 TEG(®) 和 RoTEM(®) 在创伤患者中的互换性。
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
The UK resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients with life-threatening torso haemorrhage: the (UK-REBOA) multicentre RCT.英国创伤患者伴危及生命的躯干出血行主动脉腔内球囊阻断复苏治疗的多中心 RCT(UK-REBOA)研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(54):1-122. doi: 10.3310/LTYV4082.
8
Current strategies for hemostatic control in acute trauma hemorrhage and trauma-induced coagulopathy.急性创伤性出血和创伤诱导性凝血病的止血控制策略。
Expert Rev Hematol. 2018 Dec;11(12):987-995. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2018.1548929. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Emergency red cells first: Rapid response or speed bump? The evolution of a massive transfusion protocol for trauma in a single UK centre.先输注紧急红细胞:快速反应还是障碍?英国单个中心创伤大量输血方案的演变
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1772-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.046. Epub 2015 May 31.
10
Correction of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy by Goal-directed Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the ITACTIC Trial.创伤性凝血病的目标导向治疗纠正:ITACTIC 试验的二次分析。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Nov 1;141(5):904-912. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005183.

引用本文的文献

1
Goal-directed transfusion algorithm for trauma patients with severe hemorrhage using TEG 6S: Results of a Delphi consensus survey and expert panel recommendations.使用血栓弹力图6S的创伤严重出血患者目标导向输血算法:德尔菲共识调查结果及专家小组建议
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Jun 1;98(6):984-991. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004606. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Characterising practice patterns of human derived, lyophilized coagulation concentrates within the trauma quality improvement program registry.在创伤质量改进项目登记处中描述人源冻干凝血浓缩物的应用模式。
Transfus Med. 2024 Dec;34(6):520-526. doi: 10.1111/tme.13094. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic treatment versus usual care in adults or children with bleeding.采用血栓弹力图(TEG)或血栓弹力测定法(ROTEM)监测成人或儿童出血患者的止血治疗效果并与常规治疗进行比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD007871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007871.pub3.
2
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition.《欧洲创伤后大出血和凝血功能障碍管理指南:第四版》
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 12;20:100. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1265-x.
3
Thromboelastography and Rotational Thromboelastometry use in trauma.
Correction of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy by Goal-directed Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the ITACTIC Trial.
创伤性凝血病的目标导向治疗纠正:ITACTIC 试验的二次分析。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Nov 1;141(5):904-912. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005183.
4
Digital twin mathematical models suggest individualized hemorrhagic shock resuscitation strategies.数字孪生数学模型提示个性化失血性休克复苏策略。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Jun 12;4(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00535-6.
5
Update on the pathophysiology and management of acute trauma hemorrhage and trauma-induced coagulopathy based upon viscoelastic testing.基于粘弹性检测的急性创伤出血及创伤性凝血病的病理生理学与治疗进展
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;11(3):259-267. doi: 10.15441/ceem.24.202. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
6
Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma studY (FEISTY): results from an Australian multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial.严重创伤早期纤维蛋白原研究(FEISTY):澳大利亚多中心随机对照试验的结果
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):32-46. doi: 10.51893/2021.1.OA3. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.《欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南》第六版
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 1;27(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7.
8
Utility of viscoelastic hemostatic assay to guide hemostatic resuscitation in trauma patients: a systematic review.用于指导创伤患者止血复苏的黏弹性止血检测的效用:系统评价。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Sep 13;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00454-8.
9
Gestational hemostasis: a natural model for hemostasis resuscitation of major periprocedural blood loss : "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." Albert Einstein.妊娠期止血:围手术期大出血止血复苏的自然模型:“深入探究自然,然后你将更好地理解一切。”阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦
Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 13;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00225-0.
10
Efficacy and safety of iloprost in trauma patients with haemorrhagic shock-induced endotheliopathy-Protocol for the multicentre randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, investigator-initiated shine-trauma trial.伊洛前列素治疗出血性休克诱导的内皮病变创伤患者的疗效和安全性——多中心随机、安慰剂对照、盲法、研究者发起的SHINE-创伤试验方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Apr;65(4):551-557. doi: 10.1111/aas.13776. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
血栓弹力图和旋转血栓弹力测定法在创伤中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33(Pt B):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.036. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding.用于成年创伤出血患者创伤性凝血病的血栓弹力图(TEG)和旋转血栓弹力测定法(ROTEM)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 16;2015(2):CD010438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010438.pub2.
5
Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial.严重创伤患者血浆、血小板和红细胞以1:1:1与1:1:2比例输注及死亡率:PROPPR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):471-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12.
6
Damage control resuscitation using blood component therapy in standard doses has a limited effect on coagulopathy during trauma hemorrhage.损伤控制性复苏使用标准剂量的血液成分治疗对创伤性出血期间的凝血功能障碍的效果有限。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Feb;41(2):239-47. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3584-1. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
7
Effect of thromboelastography (TEG®) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) on diagnosis of coagulopathy, transfusion guidance and mortality in trauma: descriptive systematic review.血栓弹力图(TEG®)和旋转血栓弹力测定法(ROTEM®)对创伤患者凝血病诊断、输血指导及死亡率的影响:描述性系统评价
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 27;18(5):518. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0518-9.
8
Hemostatic resuscitation is neither hemostatic nor resuscitative in trauma hemorrhage.在创伤性出血中,止血复苏既不能止血也不能复苏。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):561-7; discussion 567-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000146.
9
TEG and ROTEM: technology and clinical applications.血栓弹力图(TEG)和旋转血栓弹性测定仪(ROTEM):技术与临床应用。
Am J Hematol. 2014 Feb;89(2):228-32. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23599.
10
Low hemorrhage-related mortality in trauma patients in a Level I trauma center employing transfusion packages and early thromboelastography-directed hemostatic resuscitation with plasma and platelets.在采用输血套餐和早期血栓弹力图指导的止血复苏治疗(使用血浆和血小板)的一级创伤中心,创伤患者的出血相关死亡率较低。
Transfusion. 2013 Dec;53(12):3088-99. doi: 10.1111/trf.12214. Epub 2013 Apr 25.