Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Dec 1;57(6):1258-1268. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx121.
In the 20th century, genetic explanatory approaches became dominant in both developmental and evolutionary biological research. By contrast, physical approaches, which appeal to properties such as mechanical forces, were largely relegated to the margins, despite important advances in modeling. Recently, there have been renewed attempts to find balanced viewpoints that integrate both biological physics and molecular genetics into explanations of developmental and evolutionary phenomena. Here we introduce the 2017 SICB symposium "Physical and Genetic Mechanisms for Evolutionary Novelty" that was dedicated to exploring empirical cases where both biological physics and developmental genetic considerations are crucial. To further contextualize these case studies, we offer two theoretical frameworks for integrating genetic and physical explanations: combining complementary perspectives and comprehensive unification. We conclude by arguing that intentional reflection on conceptual questions about investigation, explanation, and integration is critical to achieving significant empirical and theoretical advances in our understanding of how novel forms originate across the tree of life.
在 20 世纪,遗传解释方法在发育生物学和进化生物学研究中占据主导地位。相比之下,尽管在建模方面取得了重要进展,但诉诸机械力等特性的物理方法在很大程度上被边缘化了。最近,人们再次尝试寻找平衡的观点,将生物物理学和分子遗传学纳入对发育和进化现象的解释中。在这里,我们介绍了 2017 年 SICB 研讨会“进化新颖性的物理和遗传机制”,该研讨会致力于探索生物学物理学和发育遗传学都至关重要的经验案例。为了进一步使这些案例研究具体化,我们提供了两个整合遗传和物理解释的理论框架:结合互补的观点和全面的统一。最后,我们认为,对关于研究、解释和整合的概念问题进行有意的反思,对于在理解生命之树中新颖形式的起源方面取得重大的经验和理论进展至关重要。