Suppr超能文献

两种针对盂肱关节多向不稳定的运动康复方案的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of 2 Exercise Rehabilitation Programs for Multidirectional Instability of the Glenohumeral Joint: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

LifeCare Prahran Sports Medicine Centre, Prahran, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):87-97. doi: 10.1177/0363546517734508. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recommended initial treatment for multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder is a rehabilitation program, yet there is very low-quality evidence to support this approach. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare the Watson MDI program and Rockwood Instability program among patients with nontraumatic, nonstructural MDI. The hypothesis was that the Watson MDI program would produce clinically and statistically superior outcomes over the Rockwood Instability program.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Forty-one participants with MDI were randomly allocated to the Watson MDI or Rockwood Instability program. Participants attended 12 weekly physiotherapy sessions for exercise prescription. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 weeks after randomization. Primary outcomes were the Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (MISS) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI). Secondary outcomes included the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire, pain, muscle strength, scapular upward rotation, scapular coordinates, global rating of change, satisfaction scales, limiting angle in abduction range, limiting factor in abduction range, and incidence of dislocation. Primary analysis was by intention to treat based on linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Between-group differences showed significant effects favoring the Watson program for the WOSI (effect size [ES], 11.1; 95% CI, 1.9-20.2; P = .018) and for the limiting factor in abduction (ES, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-1.6; P = .023) at 12 weeks, and for the WOSI (ES, 12.6; 95% CI, 3.4-21.9; P =. 008), MISS (ES, 15.4; 95% CI, 5.9-24.8; P = .002), and pain (ES, -2.0; CI: -2.3 to -0.7, P = .003) at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

For people with MDI, 12 sessions of the Watson MDI program were more effective than the Rockwood program at 12- and 24-week follow-up. Registration: ACTRN12613001240730 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).

摘要

背景

对于多向不稳定(MDI)的肩部,推荐的初始治疗方法是康复计划,但支持这种方法的证据质量非常低。目的/假设:目的是比较 Watson MDI 方案和 Rockwood 不稳定方案在非创伤性、非结构性 MDI 患者中的疗效。假设 Watson MDI 方案在临床和统计学上优于 Rockwood 不稳定方案。

研究设计

随机对照试验;证据水平,2 级。

方法

41 名 MDI 患者被随机分配到 Watson MDI 或 Rockwood 不稳定方案组。参与者每周接受 12 次物理治疗课程,进行运动处方。在随机分组后 6、12 和 24 周评估结局。主要结局指标是墨尔本不稳定肩评分(MISS)和西部安大略肩指数(WOSI)。次要结局指标包括 Orebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷、疼痛、肌肉力量、肩胛骨上旋、肩胛骨坐标、整体变化评分、满意度评分、外展范围受限角度、外展范围受限因素以及脱位发生率。主要分析是基于意向治疗的线性混合模型。

结果

组间差异显示,Watson 方案在 WOSI(效应量[ES],11.1;95%置信区间,1.9-20.2;P=.018)和外展受限因素(ES,0.1;95%置信区间,0.0-1.6;P=.023)方面具有显著的优势,在 12 周时,在 WOSI(ES,12.6;95%置信区间,3.4-21.9;P=.008)、MISS(ES,15.4;95%置信区间,5.9-24.8;P=.002)和疼痛(ES,-2.0;CI:-2.3 至-0.7,P=.003)方面也具有显著的优势。

结论

对于 MDI 患者,12 次 Watson MDI 方案在 12 周和 24 周随访时比 Rockwood 方案更有效。注册:ACTRN12613001240730(澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验