Suppr超能文献

2013 年至 2015 年期间,FDA CDER 批准的新分子实体和原创治疗性生物制品临床试验中女性和少数族裔的代表性。

Representation of Women and Minorities in Clinical Trials for New Molecular Entities and Original Therapeutic Biologics Approved by FDA CDER from 2013 to 2015.

机构信息

1 Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

2 Office of Women's Health, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration , Silver Spring, Maryland.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;27(4):418-429. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6272. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made efforts to encourage adequate assessment of women, racial/ethnic minorities, and geriatric participants in clinical trials through regulations and guidance documents. This study surveyed the demographics of clinical trial participants and the presence of efficacy and safety analyses by sex for new drugs approved between 2013 and 2015 by the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

METHODS

New drug marketing applications submitted to FDA were surveyed for demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity, and age) and the presence of sex-based analyses for efficacy and safety. The Ratio of the Proportion of women in clinical trials for the indicated disease population relative to the estimated Proportion of women in the disease population (PPR) was calculated for new drug indications.

RESULTS

Of the 102 new drugs in this cohort (defined as new molecular entity drugs and original therapeutic biologics), sex was reported for >99.9% of trial participants, and women accounted for 40.4% of these participants. An estimated 77.2% of participants were White, 6.4% were Black/African American, and 29.1% were aged ≥65 years. Sex-based analyses for both efficacy and safety were conducted for 93.1% of applications. PPR was calculated for 82 new drugs for a total of 60 indications, of which 50 indications (83.3%) had a PPR ≥0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex data are now collected for almost all study participants, and this study shows appropriate sex participation for most new drugs when estimated disease prevalence by sex (PPR) is considered. Therapeutic area and disease indication are important considerations when assessing the sex of participants because variation occurs depending on the disease under study. Some racial minorities, especially Blacks/African Americans, are still not well represented in most drug development programs and remain an area where improvement is needed.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)通过法规和指导文件,努力鼓励在临床试验中充分评估女性、种族/少数民族和老年参与者。本研究调查了 2013 年至 2015 年期间 FDA 药物评价与研究中心批准的新药临床试验参与者的人口统计学特征,以及按性别进行疗效和安全性分析的情况。

方法

对提交给 FDA 的新药营销申请进行了调查,以获取人口统计学数据(性别、种族、民族和年龄)以及按性别进行疗效和安全性分析的情况。计算了新适应证药物的临床试验中女性比例(PPR)与估计疾病人群中女性比例的比值。

结果

在该队列的 102 种新药(定义为新分子实体药物和原始治疗性生物制剂)中,试验参与者的性别报告比例超过 99.9%,女性占这些参与者的 40.4%。估计 77.2%的参与者为白人,6.4%为黑人/非裔美国人,29.1%为年龄≥65 岁。93.1%的申请都进行了疗效和安全性的性别分析。共对 82 种新药的 60 个适应证计算了 PPR,其中 50 个适应证(83.3%)的 PPR≥0.80。

结论

现在几乎所有研究参与者的性别数据都已收集,当考虑按性别估计的疾病流行率(PPR)时,本研究表明大多数新药的性别参与是适当的。治疗领域和疾病适应证是评估参与者性别的重要考虑因素,因为这取决于所研究的疾病。一些少数族裔,尤其是黑人/非裔美国人,在大多数药物开发项目中仍然代表性不足,这仍然是需要改进的领域。

相似文献

6
U.S. racial and ethnic participation in global clinical trials by therapeutic areas.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Dec;46(6):1576-1581. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13532. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Representation of women in clinical trials supporting FDA-approval of contemporary cancer therapies.
Int J Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;155(11):1958-1968. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35110. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
10
Evaluation of worldwide clinical trials by gender: An FDA perspective.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 May;80:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics, Motivations, and Preferences of Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Clinical Trials in Sweden.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Feb-Apr;20(1-2):59-70. doi: 10.1177/15562646241309142. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Challenging assumptions about the demographics of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases: A systematic review.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Apr 16;3(3):100260. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100260. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Apixaban Concentrations in Routine Clinical Care of Older Adults With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
JACC Adv. 2022 Jun;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100039. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
Ethical Criteria for Improved Human Subject Protections in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Trials.
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Sep;44(5):2-21. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500139.
8
Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100514. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
Gendered Logics of Biomedical Research: Women in U.S. Phase I Clinical Trials.
Soc Probl. 2022 May;69(2):492-509. doi: 10.1093/socpro/spaa035. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
10
Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256994. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Glob Health. 2015 Dec;5(2):020415. doi: 10.7189/jogh.05.020415.
3
Clinicopathologic features of patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring the EML4-ALK fusion gene: a meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e110617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110617. eCollection 2014.
5
Sex and gender influences on pharmacological response: an overview.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;7(4):469-85. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2014.922866. Epub 2014 May 24.
8
COPD surveillance--United States, 1999-2011.
Chest. 2013 Jul;144(1):284-305. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0809.
10
Adverse effects in women: implications for drug development and regulatory policies.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;4(4):453-66. doi: 10.1586/ecp.11.29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验