• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人类发展指数低和中等的国家进行腹股沟疝修补术后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价。

Surgical Site Infections after Inguinal Hernia Repairs Performed in Low and Middle Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Cai Lawrence Z, Foster Deshka, Kethman William C, Weiser Thomas G, Forrester Joseph D

机构信息

1 Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.

2 Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center , Stanford, California.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.154. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2017.154
PMID:29048997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernias are a common disorder in low- and middle-human development index countries (LMHDICs). Poor access to surgical care and lack of patient awareness often lead to delayed presentations of incarcerated or strangulated hernias and their associated morbidities. There is a scarcity of data on the baseline incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) after hernia repair procedures in LMHDICs.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature describing the incidence and management of SSIs after inguinal hernia repair in LMHDICs. We conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of manuscripts describing patients undergoing hernia repair to establish a baseline SSI rate for this procedure in these settings.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-three abstracts were identified after applying search criteria, and 31 were suitable for the quantitative analysis. The overall pooled SSI rate was 4.1 infections/100 open hernia repairs (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-5.3 infections/100 open repairs), which is consistent with infection rates from high-human development index countries. A separate subgroup analysis of laparoscopic hernia repairs found a weighted pooled SSI rate of 0.4 infections/100 laparoscopic repairs (95% CI 0-2.4 infections/100 laparoscopic repairs).

CONCLUSIONS

As surgical access continues to expand in LMHDIC settings, it is imperative to monitor surgical outcomes and ensure that care is provided safely. Establishing a baseline SSI rate for inguinal hernia repairs offers a useful benchmark for future studies and surgical programs in these countries.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝在低人类发展指数和中等人类发展指数国家(LMHDICs)是一种常见疾病。获得外科治疗的机会有限以及患者意识不足,常常导致嵌顿性或绞窄性疝及其相关并发症的就诊延迟。关于LMHDICs中疝修补术后手术部位感染(SSIs)的基线发病率的数据稀缺。

方法

我们对描述LMHDICs中腹股沟疝修补术后SSIs的发病率和管理的文献进行了系统综述。我们对描述接受疝修补术患者的手稿进行了定性和定量分析,以确定这些情况下该手术的基线SSI率。

结果

应用检索标准后识别出323篇摘要,31篇适合进行定量分析。总体合并SSI率为4.1例感染/100例开放性疝修补术(95%置信区间[CI]为3.0 - 5.3例感染/100例开放性修补术),这与高人类发展指数国家的感染率一致。对腹腔镜疝修补术的单独亚组分析发现,加权合并SSI率为0.4例感染/100例腹腔镜修补术(95%CI为0 - 2.4例感染/100例腹腔镜修补术)。

结论

随着LMHDICs地区外科手术可及性的持续扩大,监测手术结果并确保安全提供医疗服务至关重要。确定腹股沟疝修补术的基线SSI率为这些国家未来的研究和外科项目提供了一个有用的基准。

相似文献

1
Surgical Site Infections after Inguinal Hernia Repairs Performed in Low and Middle Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Review.在人类发展指数低和中等的国家进行腹股沟疝修补术后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.154. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
Surgical Site Infections after Appendectomy Performed in Low and Middle Human Development-Index Countries: A Systematic Review.在人类发展指数低和中等的国家进行阑尾切除术后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):237-244. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.188. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
4
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
6
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
7
Surgical Site Infections after Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Trauma in Low and Middle Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Review.人类发展指数中低收入国家创伤切开复位内固定术后手术部位感染:一项系统评价
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):254-263. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.273. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.开放式补片与非补片用于股疝和腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD002197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002197.
9
Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.预防手术部位感染的术中干预措施:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD012653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012653.pub2.
10
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging to Identify Delayed Mesh Infection Masquerading as Acute Appendicitis.影像学检查以识别伪装成急性阑尾炎的延迟性网片感染。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024 Mar 23;34(3):571-572. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1781469. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Comparing Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 23;16(5):e60959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60959. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Outcomes from Early Experience with Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Versus Open Technique: Navigating the learning curve.
腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与开放技术早期经验的结果: 探索学习曲线。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2024 May;24(2):186-193. doi: 10.18295/squmj.1.2024.001. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Perioperative complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in India: a prospective observational study.印度腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期并发症:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Dec 15;26(4):190-197. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.190.
5
Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.国际疝外科学院腹股沟疝管理指南更新。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080.
6
Improvement project to reduce surgical site infections: a retrospective cohort study.降低手术部位感染的改进项目:回顾性队列研究。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Oct 13;50:e20233380. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233380-en. eCollection 2023.
7
Severe wound infection by MRCNS following bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.双侧腹股沟疝修补术后耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌严重伤口感染。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08039-9.
8
Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后伤口感染及随后的切口疝:一例病例报告及监测数据分析
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jun;95:107235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107235. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Amyand's hernia- outcome of nylon darn repairs after complicated appendix surgeries in a district hospital: case series.艾米安德疝——地区医院复杂阑尾切除术后尼龙补片修补的结果:病例系列
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 16;71:102964. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102964. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postoperative wound infection in adults undergoing open elective inguinal or femoral hernia repair.抗生素预防用于预防接受开放性择期腹股沟或股疝修补术的成人术后伤口感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD003769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003769.pub5.