• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人类发展指数低和中等的国家进行阑尾切除术后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价

Surgical Site Infections after Appendectomy Performed in Low and Middle Human Development-Index Countries: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Foster Deshka, Kethman Will, Cai Lawrence Z, Weiser Thomas G, Forrester Joseph D

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center , Stanford, California.

2 Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):237-244. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.188. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2017.188
PMID:29058569
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency worldwide. Early intervention is associated with better outcomes. In low and middle Human Development-Index Countries (LMHDICs), late presentation and poor access to healthcare facilities can contribute to greater illness severity and higher complication rates, such as post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs). The current rate of SSIs post-appendectomy in low- and middle-index settings has yet to be described.

METHODS

We performed a systemic review of the literature describing the incidence and management of SSIs after appendectomy in LMHDICs. We conducted qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data in manuscripts describing patients undergoing appendectomy to establish a baseline SSI rate for this procedure in these settings.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-three abstracts were initially identified. Of these, 35 studies met the criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The overall weighted, pooled SSI rated were 17.9 infections/100 open appendectomies (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.4-25.3 infections/100 open appendectomies) and 8.8 infections/100 laparoscopic appendectomies (95% CI 4.5-13.2 infections/100 laparoscopic appendectomies). The SSI rates were higher in complicated appendicitis and when pre-operative antibiotic use was not specified.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed SSI rates after appendectomy in LMHDICs are dramatically higher than rates in high Human Development-Index Countries. This is particularly true in cases of open appendectomy, which remains the most common surgical approach in LMHDICs. These findings highlight the need for SSI prevention in LMHDICs, including prompt access to medical and surgical care, routine pre-operative antibiotic use, and implementation of bundled care packages and checklists.

摘要

背景

急性阑尾炎是全球常见的外科急症。早期干预与更好的治疗效果相关。在人类发展指数较低和中等的国家(LMHDICs),就诊延迟和难以获得医疗设施会导致病情更严重,并发症发生率更高,如术后手术部位感染(SSIs)。目前低中等指数环境下阑尾切除术后SSIs的发生率尚未见报道。

方法

我们对描述LMHDICs阑尾切除术后SSIs发生率及管理的文献进行了系统综述。我们对描述接受阑尾切除术患者的手稿中的数据进行了定性和定量分析,以确定这些环境下该手术的SSIs基线发生率。

结果

最初识别出423篇摘要。其中,35项研究符合定性和定量分析标准。总体加权合并SSIs发生率为每100例开放性阑尾切除术有17.9例感染(95%置信区间[CI]为每100例开放性阑尾切除术10.4 - 25.3例感染),每100例腹腔镜阑尾切除术有8.8例感染(95% CI为每100例腹腔镜阑尾切除术4.5 - 13.2例感染)。复杂阑尾炎以及未明确术前使用抗生素时,SSIs发生率更高。

结论

LMHDICs阑尾切除术后观察到的SSIs发生率显著高于人类发展指数较高国家的发生率。在开放性阑尾切除术中尤其如此,开放性阑尾切除术仍是LMHDICs最常见的手术方式。这些发现凸显了在LMHDICs预防SSIs的必要性,包括及时获得医疗和外科护理、常规术前使用抗生素以及实施综合护理套餐和清单。

相似文献

1
Surgical Site Infections after Appendectomy Performed in Low and Middle Human Development-Index Countries: A Systematic Review.在人类发展指数低和中等的国家进行阑尾切除术后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):237-244. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.188. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Surgical Site Infections after Inguinal Hernia Repairs Performed in Low and Middle Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Review.在人类发展指数低和中等的国家进行腹股沟疝修补术后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.154. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
3
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后腹腔引流预防腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 17;8(8):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub4.
4
Surgical Site Infections after Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Trauma in Low and Middle Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Review.人类发展指数中低收入国家创伤切开复位内固定术后手术部位感染:一项系统评价
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):254-263. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.273. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy as the gold standard: What role remains for open surgery, conversion, and disease severity? : An analysis of 32,000 cases with appendicitis in Germany.腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为金标准:开放手术、中转手术及疾病严重程度还发挥着什么作用?:对德国32000例阑尾炎病例的分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 18;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00626-2.
6
Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendectomy.抗生素与安慰剂预防阑尾切除术后感染的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001439.
7
Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.预防手术部位感染的术中干预措施:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD012653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012653.pub2.
8
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.对于复杂性阑尾炎行开腹阑尾切除术后,行腹腔引流以预防腹腔内脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub3.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
10
Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy.抗生素与安慰剂预防阑尾切除术后感染的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD001439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001439.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of dilute povidone-iodine versus normal saline for preventing surgical site infections following appendectomy: a prospective observational study in Ghanaian tertiary hospital.评估稀聚维酮碘与生理盐水在预防阑尾切除术后手术部位感染方面的疗效:加纳三级医院的一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03088-0.
2
Association between thickness of subcutaneous fat and incisional surgical site infection following appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on observational studies.阑尾切除术后皮下脂肪厚度与手术切口部位感染的关联:一项关于观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 22;25(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03010-8.
3
A Retrospective Cohort Study on Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Open Appendectomy: Predictive Factors and Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model.
一项关于开放性阑尾切除术后手术部位感染的回顾性队列研究:预测因素及风险预测模型的建立与验证
Cureus. 2025 Jun 10;17(6):e85697. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85697. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Surgical site infection following appendectomy in children.儿童阑尾切除术后手术部位感染
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 21;15(1):6321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79939-2.
5
Effect of Fascia Closure with Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Suture on Surgical Site Infection in Open Appendectomy Wounds: A Comparative Study.三氯生涂层聚二氧六环酮缝线筋膜闭合对开放性阑尾切除伤口手术部位感染的影响:一项对比研究。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Apr-Jun;14(2):154-158. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_25_23. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
6
Antimicrobial approach of abdominal post-surgical infections.腹部手术后感染的抗菌治疗方法。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2674-2692. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2674.
7
Risk Factors for Post-appendectomy Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopy and Laparotomy - Retrospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术后手术部位感染的危险因素——回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 28;15(8):e44237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44237. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Surgical Site Infection Post-appendectomy in a Tertiary Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达市一家三级医院阑尾切除术后手术部位感染情况
Cureus. 2021 Jul 5;13(7):e16187. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16187. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Thickness of subcutaneous fat is a risk factor for incisional surgical site infection in acute appendicitis surgery: a prospective study.皮下脂肪厚度是急性阑尾炎手术切口部位感染的一个危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-01029-7.
10
Global incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球阑尾切除术术后手术部位感染发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034266.