• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基础生物学考试中,女性处于劣势。

Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology.

作者信息

Ballen Cissy J, Salehi Shima, Cotner Sehoya

机构信息

Department of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.

Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186419. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186419
PMID:29049334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5648180/
Abstract

The gender gap in STEM fields has prompted a great deal of discussion, but what factors underlie performance deficits remain poorly understood. We show that female students underperformed on exams compared to their male counterparts across ten large introductory biology course sections in fall 2016 (N > 1500 students). Females also reported higher levels of test anxiety and course-relevant science interest. Results from mediation analyses revealed an intriguing pattern: for female students only, and regardless of their academic standing, test anxiety negatively impacted exam performance, while interest in the course-specific science topics increased exam performance. Thus, instructors seeking equitable classrooms can aim to decrease test anxiety and increase student interest in science course content. We provide strategies for mitigating test anxiety and suggestions for alignment of course content with student interest, with the hope of successfully reimagining the STEM pathway as one that is equally accessible to all.

摘要

科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的性别差距引发了大量讨论,但导致成绩差距的潜在因素仍鲜为人知。我们发现,在2016年秋季十个大型生物学入门课程班中(超过1500名学生),女生在考试中的表现不如男生。女生还报告称考试焦虑水平更高,且对与课程相关的科学兴趣更浓厚。中介分析结果揭示了一个有趣的模式:仅对于女生而言,无论她们的学业成绩如何,考试焦虑对考试成绩有负面影响,而对特定课程科学主题的兴趣则提高了考试成绩。因此,希望营造公平课堂环境的教师可以致力于降低考试焦虑,并提高学生对科学课程内容的兴趣。我们提供了减轻考试焦虑的策略,以及使课程内容与学生兴趣相匹配的建议,希望成功地重新构想STEM道路,使其对所有人都同样畅通无阻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fa/5648180/c6788ce30aaf/pone.0186419.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fa/5648180/2d7e77b37c6e/pone.0186419.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fa/5648180/c6788ce30aaf/pone.0186419.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fa/5648180/2d7e77b37c6e/pone.0186419.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fa/5648180/c6788ce30aaf/pone.0186419.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology.在基础生物学考试中,女性处于劣势。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186419. eCollection 2017.
2
Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?混合评估方法能否使生物课堂更加公平?
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0189610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189610. eCollection 2017.
3
Cognitive Difficulty and Format of Exams Predicts Gender and Socioeconomic Gaps in Exam Performance of Students in Introductory Biology Courses.认知难度和考试形式预测了生物学入门课程学生考试成绩中的性别和社会经济差距。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0246.
4
Student anxiety in introductory biology classrooms: Perceptions about active learning and persistence in the major.生物学入门课堂上学生的焦虑情绪:对主动学习及专业坚持度的认知
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182506. eCollection 2017.
5
Can Test Anxiety Interventions Alleviate a Gender Gap in an Undergraduate STEM Course?考试焦虑干预能否缓解本科 STEM 课程中的性别差距?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-05-0083.
6
Student Anxiety and Perception of Difficulty Impact Performance and Persistence in Introductory Biology Courses.学生的焦虑和对难度的感知会影响入门生物学课程的表现和坚持度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar21. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0284.
7
Verbal final exam in introductory biology yields gains in student content knowledge and longitudinal performance.入门生物学的口头期末考试可提高学生的内容知识和纵向表现。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Fall;12(3):515-29. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-04-0050.
8
Helping struggling students in introductory biology: a peer-tutoring approach that improves performance, perception, and retention.帮助生物学入门课程中学习困难的学生:一种提高成绩、改善认知并增强记忆的同伴辅导方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-08-0120.
9
Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course.带有元认知成分的写作任务可提高大型基础生物学课程的学习效果。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Summer;13(2):311-21. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-05-0097.
10
Is Support in the Anxiety of the Beholder? How Anxiety Interacts with Perceptions of Instructor Support in Introductory Biology Classes.支持在旁观者的焦虑中吗?在基础生物学课程中,焦虑如何与对教师支持的感知相互作用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar45. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0092.

引用本文的文献

1
Grade Disparities Associated with Student Demographics in Upper-Division Biology Courses Across Multiple Institutions.多所院校生物专业高年级课程学生人口统计学特征与成绩差异
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):ar36. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0075.
2
"We are way too stressed": Balancing Academic Priorities with Mental Health and Wellness Among Life Science Undergraduates.“我们压力太大了”:生命科学专业本科生如何平衡学业重点与心理健康及幸福感
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Jun 1;24(2):ar23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-09-0226.
3
Self-Efficacy is a Stronger Predictor of Final Grade Than Motivation in an Introductory Biology Course: A Structural Equation Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms.多个基础生物学课堂中成绩和参与度方面的性别差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Fall;13(3):478-92. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204.
2
Getting under the hood: how and for whom does increasing course structure work?深入探究:增加课程结构对谁有效以及如何起作用?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Fall;13(3):453-68. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050.
3
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.生命科学领域的杰出男性教职人员雇用的女性较少。
在一门基础生物学课程中,自我效能感比学习动机更能有效预测期末成绩:一项结构方程分析。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Jun 1;24(2):ar21. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-09-0233.
4
Undergraduate STEM Students' Perceptions of Grading Practices Reveal that Quiz Retakes Positively Impact Drivers of Self-determination.本科理工科学生对评分方式的看法表明,重考测验对自主决定的驱动因素有积极影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar4. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-06-0167.
5
Breaking Stereotypes: How Undergraduates' Life Experiences of Scientists Shape their Scopes of Possibility.打破刻板印象:大学生对科学家的生活经历如何塑造他们的可能性范围。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar58. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-05-0148.
6
Exam reform: an opportunity for the redistribution of academic power.考试改革:学术权力重新分配的契机。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Dec 12;25(3):e0011924. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00119-24. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
7
Optional Exam Retakes Reduce Anxiety but may Exacerbate Score Disparities Between Students with Different Social Identities.选修考试重考可减少焦虑,但可能加剧不同社会身份学生之间的分数差距。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-11-0320.
8
Gender Identity and Student Perceptions of Peer Research Aptitude in CUREs and Traditional Laboratory Courses in the Biological Sciences.性别认同与学生对生物科学 CUREs 和传统实验室课程中同伴研究能力的看法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar53. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0054.
9
Gendered Performance Gaps in an Upper-Division Biology Course: Academic, Demographic, Environmental, and Affective Factors.性别在高级生物学课程中的表现差距:学术、人口统计学、环境和情感因素。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar52. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-03-0041.
10
Breaking the mold: Study strategies of students who improve their achievement on introductory biology exams.打破常规:提高生物学入门考试成绩的学生的学习策略研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 3;18(7):e0287313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287313. eCollection 2023.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403334111. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
4
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
How stereotypes impair women's careers in science.刻板印象如何阻碍女性在科学领域的职业发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 25;111(12):4403-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314788111. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
6
When does anxiety help or hinder cognitive test performance? The role of working memory capacity.焦虑在什么时候有助于或阻碍认知测试表现?工作记忆容量的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Feb;105(1):92-101. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12009. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
7
Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science.文献计量学:科学领域的全球性别差异
Nature. 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):211-3. doi: 10.1038/504211a.
8
Are all interventions created equal? A multi-threat approach to tailoring stereotype threat interventions.所有干预措施都是平等的吗?针对刻板印象威胁干预措施的多威胁方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(2):277-88. doi: 10.1037/a0030461. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology.增加结构和主动学习可以缩小生物学入门课程的成绩差距。
Science. 2011 Jun 3;332(6034):1213-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1204820.