Suppr超能文献

口服司美格鲁肽与安慰剂及皮下注射司美格鲁肽对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机临床试验

Effect of Oral Semaglutide Compared With Placebo and Subcutaneous Semaglutide on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Davies Melanie, Pieber Thomas R, Hartoft-Nielsen Marie-Louise, Hansen Oluf K H, Jabbour Serge, Rosenstock Julio

机构信息

Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1460-1470. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14752.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are effective therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and are all currently available as an injection.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of oral semaglutide with placebo (primary) and open-label subcutaneous semaglutide (secondary) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Phase 2, randomized, parallel-group, dosage-finding, 26-week trial with 5-week follow-up at 100 sites (hospital clinics, general practices, and clinical research centers) in 14 countries conducted between December 2013 and December 2014. Of 1106 participants assessed, 632 with type 2 diabetes and insufficient glycemic control using diet and exercise alone or a stable dose of metformin were randomized. Randomization was stratified by metformin use.

INTERVENTIONS

Once-daily oral semaglutide of 2.5 mg (n = 70), 5 mg (n = 70), 10 mg (n = 70), 20 mg (n = 70), 40-mg 4-week dose escalation (standard escalation; n = 71), 40-mg 8-week dose escalation (slow escalation; n = 70), 40-mg 2-week dose escalation (fast escalation, n = 70), oral placebo (n = 71; double-blind) or once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide of 1.0 mg (n = 70) for 26 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 26. Secondary end points included change from baseline in body weight and adverse events.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. Of the 632 randomized patients (mean age, 57.1 years [SD, 10.6]; men, 395 (62.7%); diabetes duration, 6.3 years [SD, 5.2]; body weight, 92.3 kg [SD, 16.8]; BMI, 31.7 [SD, 4.3]), 583 (92%) completed the trial. Mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 26 decreased with oral semaglutide (dosage-dependent range, -0.7% to -1.9%) and subcutaneous semaglutide (-1.9%) and placebo (-0.3%); oral semaglutide reductions were significant vs placebo (dosage-dependent estimated treatment difference [ETD] range for oral semaglutide vs placebo, -0.4% to -1.6%; P = .01 for 2.5 mg, <.001 for all other dosages). Reductions in body weight were greater with oral semaglutide (dosage-dependent range, -2.1 kg to -6.9 kg) and subcutaneous semaglutide (-6.4 kg) vs placebo (-1.2 kg), and significant for oral semaglutide dosages of 10 mg or more vs placebo (dosage-dependent ETD range, -0.9 to -5.7 kg; P < .001). Adverse events were reported by 63% to 86% (371 of 490 patients) in the oral semaglutide groups, 81% (56 of 69 patients) in the subcutaneous semaglutide group, and 68% (48 of 71 patients) in the placebo group; mild to moderate gastrointestinal events were most common.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with type 2 diabetes, oral semaglutide resulted in better glycemic control than placebo over 26 weeks. These findings support phase 3 studies to assess longer-term and clinical outcomes, as well as safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01923181.

摘要

重要性

胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂是治疗2型糖尿病的有效疗法,目前均为注射剂。

目的

比较口服司美格鲁肽与安慰剂(主要)以及开放标签皮下注射司美格鲁肽(次要)对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。

设计、地点和患者:2013年12月至2014年12月在14个国家的100个地点(医院诊所、全科医疗和临床研究中心)进行的2期随机、平行组、剂量探索性、为期26周的试验,并有5周的随访。在1106名评估参与者中,632名仅通过饮食和运动或稳定剂量二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者被随机分组。随机分组按二甲双胍使用情况进行分层。

干预措施

每日一次口服2.5毫克(n = 70)、5毫克(n = 70)、10毫克(n = 70)、20毫克(n = 70)的司美格鲁肽,40毫克4周剂量递增(标准递增;n = 7)、40毫克8周剂量递增(缓慢递增;n = 70)、40毫克2周剂量递增(快速递增;n = 70),口服安慰剂(n = 71;双盲)或每周一次皮下注射1.0毫克司美格鲁肽(n = 70),共26周。

主要结局和测量指标

主要终点是从基线到第26周糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。次要终点包括体重相对于基线的变化和不良事件。

结果

各治疗组的基线特征具有可比性。在632名随机分组的患者中(平均年龄57.1岁[标准差10.6];男性395名[62.7%];糖尿病病程6.3年[标准差5.2];体重92.3千克[标准差16.8];体重指数31.7[标准差4.3]),583名(92%)完成了试验。从基线到第26周,口服司美格鲁肽(剂量依赖性范围为-0.7%至-1.9%)、皮下注射司美格鲁肽(-1.9%)和安慰剂(-0.3%)组的HbA1c水平平均变化均降低;口服司美格鲁肽组与安慰剂组相比降低显著(口服司美格鲁肽与安慰剂的剂量依赖性估计治疗差异[ETD]范围为-0.4%至-1.6%;2.5毫克时P = 0.01,其他所有剂量时P < 0.001)。与安慰剂组(-1.2千克)相比,口服司美格鲁肽(剂量依赖性范围为-2.1千克至-6.9千克)和皮下注射司美格鲁肽(-6.4千克)组体重减轻更多,口服司美格鲁肽10毫克及以上剂量与安慰剂相比体重减轻显著(剂量依赖性ETD范围为-0.9至-5.7千克;P < 0.001)。口服司美格鲁肽组63%至86%(490名患者中的371名)、皮下注射司美格鲁肽组81%(69名患者中的56名)和安慰剂组68%(71名患者中的48名)报告了不良事件;轻度至中度胃肠道事件最为常见。

结论与意义

在2型糖尿病患者中,口服司美格鲁肽在26周内血糖控制优于安慰剂。这些发现支持进行3期研究以评估长期疗效、临床结局以及安全性。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01923181

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Therapy: Gastrointestinal safety of incretin therapies: are we there yet?治疗:肠促胰岛素疗法的胃肠道安全性:我们做到了吗?
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;13(11):630-632. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.149. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
2
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.司美格鲁肽与 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.利拉鲁肽与2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验