Kidane Biniam, Peel John K, Seely Andrew, Malthaner Richard A, Finley Christian, Grondin Sean, Louie Brian E, Srinathan Sadeesh, Darling Gail E
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;25(6):872-876. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx252.
Our objective was to assess perioperative pneumonectomy practices among Canadian thoracic surgeons as part of a quality-improvement initiative to determine practice variability and identify areas for study/improvement.
After several rounds of survey development and piloting, a 29-item survey was distributed using the Dillman method to all practicing members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons.
The response rate was 87% (62 of 71). Median number of pneumonectomies performed annually was 3.5 (interquartile range 2.75-5.00). Routine preoperative workup was variable, but the most consistently reported tests were diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (87%, n = 54) and spirometry (85%, n = 53). Reported routine use of epidurals (84%, n = 52) was more prevalent than paravertebral blocks (18%, n = 11). Many (69%, n = 43) reported intraoperative restriction <2 l. Postoperatively, 84% (n = 52) reported daily fluid restriction <2 l. Regarding intraoperative protective ventilation strategies, respondents appeared more focused on minimizing peak airway pressures (55%, n = 34) rather than tidal volumes (18%, n = 11). Twenty-four percent (n = 15) reported using intraoperative steroids in attempts to decrease postoperative complications. Thirty-two percent (n = 20) do not routinely insert chest tubes, whereas the most common practice (44%, n = 27) was to insert chest tubes attached to conventional drainage systems without suction. Eighty-two percent (n = 52) reported willingness to participate in multicentre studies regarding perioperative pneumonectomy practices.
Our findings suggest significant variability in reported preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care practices for pneumonectomy across Canada. This survey has a high response rate, representing the Canadian experience, and highlights several areas for study and quality-improvement initiatives. Many respondents report willingness to participate in multicentre initiatives.
作为一项质量改进计划的一部分,我们的目标是评估加拿大胸外科医生的围手术期肺切除术操作,以确定操作的变异性并确定研究/改进领域。
经过几轮调查问卷的开发和试点后,采用迪尔曼方法向加拿大胸外科医生协会的所有执业会员发放了一份包含29个条目的调查问卷。
回复率为87%(71人中62人回复)。每年进行肺切除术的中位数为3.5例(四分位间距为2.75 - 5.00例)。常规术前检查各不相同,但报告最一致的检查是肺一氧化碳弥散量(87%,n = 54)和肺量计检查(85%,n = 53)。报告的硬膜外麻醉常规使用率(84%,n = 52)高于椎旁阻滞(18%,n = 11)。许多人(69%,n = 43)报告术中液体限制<2升。术后,84%(n = 52)报告每日液体限制<2升。关于术中保护性通气策略,受访者似乎更关注将气道峰压降至最低(55%,n = 34),而非潮气量(18%,n = 11)。24%(n = 15)报告使用术中类固醇以试图减少术后并发症。32%(n = 20)不常规插入胸管,而最常见的做法(44%,n = 27)是插入连接传统引流系统且不使用负压吸引的胸管。82%(n = 52)报告愿意参与关于围手术期肺切除术操作的多中心研究。
我们的研究结果表明,加拿大各地报告的肺切除术术前、术中和术后护理操作存在显著差异。本次调查回复率高,代表了加拿大的经验,并突出了几个研究和质量改进计划的领域。许多受访者表示愿意参与多中心计划。