• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死后室间隔缺损的外科治疗:危险因素及预后分析

Surgical treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal defect: risk factors and outcome analysis.

作者信息

Pojar Marek, Harrer Jan, Omran Nedal, Turek Zdenek, Striteska Jana, Vojacek Jan

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;26(1):41-46. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx230.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivx230
PMID:29049690
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Postinfarction ventricular septal defect is a serious mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction associated with high postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to review our experience with surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect and to identify predictors of early and late outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients (19 men and 20 women, mean age 68.4 ± 9.9 years) with postinfarction ventricular septal defect who underwent surgical repair at our institution between 1996 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Risk factors were assessed by univariate analysis, with those found significant included in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The ventricular septal defect was anterior in 21 (54%) patients and posterior in 18 (46%) patients. Mean aortic cross-clamp time was 91.8 ± 26.8 min, and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 146.3 ± 49.7 min. Twelve (31%) patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. The 30-day mortality rate was 36% (n = 14). The 30-day survival rate was higher with than without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (83% vs 56%), but concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting did not influence late survival (P = 0.098). Univariate analysis identified age, emergency surgery, inotropic support, Killip class, preoperative aspartate aminotransferase concentration, renal replacement therapy and ventricular septal defect diagnosis to operation interval as predictors of 30-day mortality. However, multivariate analysis showed that age and renal replacement therapy were the only independent risk factors of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect has a high 30-day mortality rate. Higher age at presentation and postoperative renal replacement therapy are independent predictors of early mortality.

摘要

目的

心肌梗死后室间隔缺损是急性心肌梗死严重的机械性并发症,术后死亡率高。本研究旨在回顾我们对心肌梗死后室间隔缺损手术修复的经验,并确定早期和晚期预后的预测因素。

方法

回顾性评估1996年至2016年在我院接受手术修复的39例心肌梗死后室间隔缺损患者(19例男性,20例女性,平均年龄68.4±9.9岁)。通过单因素分析评估危险因素,将有统计学意义的因素纳入多因素分析。

结果

21例(54%)患者的室间隔缺损位于前方,18例(46%)患者的室间隔缺损位于后方。平均主动脉阻断时间为91.8±26.8分钟,平均体外循环时间为146.3±49.7分钟。12例(31%)患者同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术。30天死亡率为36%(n = 14)。同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的30天生存率高于未同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者(83%对56%), 但同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术对晚期生存率无影响(P = 0.098)。单因素分析确定年龄、急诊手术、血管活性药物支持、Killip分级、术前天冬氨酸转氨酶浓度、肾脏替代治疗及室间隔缺损诊断至手术间隔时间为30天死亡率的预测因素。然而,多因素分析显示年龄和肾脏替代治疗是30天死亡率的唯一独立危险因素。

结论

心肌梗死后室间隔缺损手术修复的30天死亡率较高。就诊时年龄较大及术后肾脏替代治疗是早期死亡率的独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal defect: risk factors and outcome analysis.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损的外科治疗:危险因素及预后分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;26(1):41-46. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx230.
2
Long-term results after surgical treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂手术治疗的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Apr;47(4):720-4. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu248. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Risk factors of mortality after surgical correction of ventricular septal defect following myocardial infarction: Retrospective analysis and review of the literature.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损手术矫正术后死亡的危险因素:回顾性分析及文献综述
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;206:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
Post-infarction ventricular septal defect: surgical outcomes in the last decade.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损:过去十年的手术治疗结果
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2013 Oct;21(5):539-45. doi: 10.1177/0218492312462041. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
5
Surgical repair of post infarction ventricular septal defects: a national experience.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损的外科修复:一项全国性经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.10.037.
6
A modified infarct exclusion technique for repair of anteroapical postinfarction ventricular septal defect.一种改良的梗死灶排除技术用于修复前尖部心肌梗死后室间隔缺损。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(3):299-302.
7
Mortality and risk factors after a surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损修补术后的死亡率和危险因素。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(8):555-558. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2021_088.
8
Surgical repair of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: a retrospective analysis of a single institution experience.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损的外科修复:单中心经验的回顾性分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Nov 10;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02418-8.
9
Perventricular closure on the beating heart: an effective hybrid approach in managing a postinfarction apical ventricular septal defect.心脏跳动时的室周封堵:一种治疗心肌梗死后心尖部室间隔缺损的有效杂交方法。
J Card Surg. 2013 Jan;28(1):16-8. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12031. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Percutaneous closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect: in-hospital outcomes and long-term follow-up of UK experience.经皮心肌梗死后室间隔缺损封堵术:英国的临床结果和长期随访经验。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2395-402. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005839. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Completeness of Revascularization on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.再灌注完整性对心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者长期预后的影响。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 16;26(6):27049. doi: 10.31083/RCM27049. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Clinical Outcomes for Postinfarct Ventricular Septal Defect Repair in a Large State-Wide Surgical Registry.大型全州外科登记处中梗死后期室间隔缺损修复的临床结果
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Apr 1;240:64-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.028. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
The role of Impella in the pre-procedural management of post-infarct ventricular septal defect: a systematic review.
Impella在心肌梗死后室间隔缺损术前管理中的作用:一项系统评价
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae212.
4
Role of ECLS in Managing Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.体外膜肺氧合在管理心肌梗死后室间隔破裂中的作用。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Oct 30;10(11):446. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110446.
5
Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.经导管封堵心肌梗死后室间隔缺损:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2023 May 29;9(6):e16708. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16708. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Surgical management for mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of long-term outcomes.急性心肌梗死机械并发症的外科治疗:长期预后的系统评价
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May;11(3):239-251. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-ami-20.
7
Effects of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting on early and late mortality in the treatment of post-infarction mechanical complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术同期治疗心肌梗死后机械并发症对早期和晚期死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May;11(3):210-225. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-ami-19.
8
Concomitant surgical revascularization in postinfarction ventricular septal rupture and ventricular aneurysm repair: A straightforward indication or a prognostic factor?心肌梗死后室间隔破裂和室壁瘤修复术中同期外科血管重建:是明确指征还是预后因素?
J Card Surg. 2022 Sep;37(9):2703-2705. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16673. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Surgical Treatment of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的外科治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28309.
10
Clinical Characteristics and Contemporary Prognosis of Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔破裂的临床特征及当代预后:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 13;8:679148. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.679148. eCollection 2021.