Suppr超能文献

Conditioned defensive burying as a model for identifying anxiolytics.

作者信息

Craft R M, Howard J L, Pollard G T

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Jul;30(3):775-80. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90098-6.

Abstract

Rats exposed to a presumably aversive stimulus such as electric shock respond by heaping litter on the source, a behavior known as conditioned defensive burying (CDB). Because some anxiolytics suppress this behavior, CDB has been proposed as a screening method for anxiolytics. We tested the effects of the conventional anxiolytics chlordiazepoxide (4-32 mg/kg) and meprobamate (75-125 mg/kg), the novel anxiolytic buspirone (8-64 mg/kg), the antidepressant imipramine (4-16 mg/kg), the opiate analgesic morphine (2-8 mg/kg), and the antipsychotic chlorpromazine (1-16 mg/kg) on CDB. Chlordiazepoxide, meprobamate, imipramine, and morphine significantly suppressed CDB, but chlordiazepoxide did so only at a dose that reduced general activity. Buspirone and chlorpromazine did not suppress CDB at doses that reduced activity. There were some methodological differences from previous studies. We conclude that the test as constituted in this study lacks drug-class specificity. The necessity of distinguishing between specific reduction of burying and general reduction of activity is emphasized.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验