Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Conn.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):632-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.092. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Resumption of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome is recommended, but the current practice pattern in the United States remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the current pattern of dual antiplatelet therapy use after coronary artery bypass grafting at the Yale-New Haven Hospital.
We conducted a single-center retrospective review of patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between 2014 and 2016. The primary outcome was hospital discharge with dual antiplatelet therapy. Mixed-effect multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of dual antiplatelet therapy use or nonuse, accounting for surgeon-specific preference. The discriminatory ability of the model was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics analysis.
Of 572 patients included, only 29% were discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy. In the mixed-effect multivariate model isolating surgeon preferences, increase in age (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.98; P < .001) and discharge with anticoagulants (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.55; P = .002) were associated with lower odds of dual antiplatelet therapy use. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with increased odds of dual antiplatelet therapy use (odds ratio, 31.5; 95% confidence interval, 12.8-77.2; P < .001). C-index of the prediction model was 0.74.
The overall rate of dual antiplatelet therapy use in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting was low and variable among surgeons. The use or nonuse was guided by previously established risk factors of recurrent ischemia and bleeding, along with surgeon preference.
建议在急性冠状动脉综合征患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术后恢复双联抗血小板治疗,但目前美国的实际应用模式尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查耶鲁-纽黑文医院行冠状动脉旁路移植术后双联抗血小板治疗的实际应用模式。
我们对 2014 年至 2016 年间因急性冠状动脉综合征行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。主要结局为出院时接受双联抗血小板治疗。采用混合效应多变量逻辑回归分析评估双联抗血小板治疗使用或不使用的预测因素,同时考虑外科医生的偏好。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估模型的判别能力。
572 例患者中,仅有 29%出院时接受双联抗血小板治疗。在排除外科医生偏好的混合效应多变量模型中,年龄增加(比值比,0.95;95%置信区间,0.92-0.98;P<0.001)和出院时使用抗凝剂(比值比,0.20;95%置信区间,0.07-0.55;P=0.002)与双联抗血小板治疗使用率降低相关。与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与双联抗血小板治疗使用率增加相关(比值比,31.5;95%置信区间,12.8-77.2;P<0.001)。预测模型的 C 指数为 0.74。
在因急性冠状动脉综合征行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,双联抗血小板治疗的总体使用率较低,且外科医生之间的使用率存在差异。双联抗血小板治疗的使用或不使用取决于已确立的再发缺血和出血风险因素以及外科医生的偏好。