Suppr超能文献

家庭与医院着装对产科环境中手术刷手服细菌污染的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Impact of home versus hospital dressing on bacterial contamination of surgical scrubs in the obstetric setting: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Carolina Greenville School of Medicine/Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC.

Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2018 Apr;46(4):379-382. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of the site where an obstetrician dresses in their surgical scrubs, home versus hospital, on total bacterial burden remains unknown. Therefore, our objective was to quantify the effect of dressing in surgical scrubs at home versus at the hospital on the bacterial contamination at the beginning of a scheduled shift.

METHODS

This was a single blind randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants were resident physicians assigned to labor and delivery at a single institution during the study period, and participants were randomized daily to 1 of 4 arms based on the site where their scrubs were laundered (A) and where the resident dressed (B) (A/B): home/home, home/hospital, hospital/home, and hospital/hospital. At the beginning of the assigned shift, microbiologic samples from the chest pocket and pants' tie were collected with a sterile culture swab. Samples were plated on trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood before being incubated at 35°C-37°C for 48 hours, with observation every 24 hours. The primary outcome was total bacterial burden, defined as the sum of the colony forming units (CFUs) from the 2 sampling sites.

RESULTS

There were 21 residents randomized daily for 4 days to 1 of 4 study arms, resulting in 84 observations. There were no baseline differences between the home- and hospital-dressed cohorts. Overall, 68% of sampled scrubs demonstrated some bacterial growth. There was no difference between the home- and hospital-dressed cohorts in percentage of samples demonstrating any bacterial growth after 72 hours (60% vs 76%, P = .14), nor in median bacterial burden at the beginning of a shift (2 [interquartile range, 0-7] vs 1 [interquartile range, 1-5] CFUs, P = .62). Finally, there was no difference in total bacterial burden at the beginning of a shift between the home- and hospital-dressed cohorts when stratified by site where the scrubs were laundered.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in total bacterial burden of surgical scrubs at the start of a shift between cohorts who dressed at home versus at the hospital.

摘要

背景

产科医生在手术服中穿的地方(家中或医院)对总细菌负担的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们的目的是量化在家中或医院穿手术服对预定班次开始时细菌污染的影响。

方法

这是一项单盲随机对照试验。合格的参与者是在研究期间分配到一家机构的住院医师,并且根据他们的手术服洗涤地点(A)和居民穿衣地点(B)(A/B)每天随机分为 4 个臂:家庭/家庭、家庭/医院、医院/家庭和医院/医院。在指定班次开始时,用无菌培养拭子从胸袋和裤带收集微生物样本。将样本接种在含有 5%绵羊血的胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂上,然后在 35°C-37°C孵育 48 小时,每 24 小时观察一次。主要结局是总细菌负担,定义为来自 2 个采样部位的菌落形成单位(CFU)的总和。

结果

每天随机分配 21 名住院医师到 4 天的 4 个研究臂中的 1 个,共 84 次观察。在家和医院穿衣服的队列之间没有基线差异。总体而言,68%的采样手术服显示出一些细菌生长。72 小时后,在家和医院穿衣服的队列中显示任何细菌生长的样本比例没有差异(60%比 76%,P = .14),班次开始时的中位细菌负担也没有差异(2 [四分位距,0-7]与 1 [四分位距,1-5]CFU,P = .62)。最后,当按手术服洗涤地点分层时,在家和医院穿衣服的队列在班次开始时的总细菌负担没有差异。

结论

在家中或医院穿手术服的班次开始时,总细菌负担在两组之间没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验