Epidemiology and Infection Control, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia WI 53705, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;33(3):268-75. doi: 10.1086/664045. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
The impact of antimicrobial scrubs on healthcare worker (HCW) bacterial burden is unknown. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of antimicrobial scrubs on hand and apparel bacterial burden.
Prospective, crossover trial.
Thirty HCWs randomized to study versus control scrubs in an intensive care unit.
Weekly microbiology samples were obtained from scrub abdominal area, cargo pocket, and hands. Mean log colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were calculated. Compliance with hand hygiene practices was measured. Apparel and hand mean log CFU counts were compared.
Adherence measures were 78% (910/1,173) for hand hygiene and 82% (223/273) for scrubs. Culture compliance was 67% (306/460). No differences were observed in bacterial hand burden or in HCWs with unique positive scrub cultures. No difference in vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and gram-negative rod (GNR) burden was observed. A difference in mean log methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CFU count was found between study and control scrubs for leg cargo pocket (mean log CFUs, 11.84 control scrub vs 6.71 study scrub; [Formula: see text]), abdominal area (mean log CFUs, 11.35 control scrub vs 7.54 study scrub; [Formula: see text]), leg cargo pocket at the beginning of shift (mean log CFUs, 11.96 control scrub vs 4.87 study scrub; [Formula: see text]), and abdominal area pocket at the end of shift (mean log CFUs, 12.14 control scrubs vs 8.22 study scrub; [Formula: see text]).
Study scrubs were associated with a 4-7 mean log reduction in MRSA burden but not VRE or GNRs. A prospective trial is needed to measure the impact of antimicrobial impregnated apparel on MRSA transmission rates.
抗菌刷手服对医护人员(HCW)细菌负荷的影响尚不清楚。目的。确定抗菌刷手服对手和服装细菌负荷的有效性。
前瞻性、交叉试验。
在重症监护病房中,将 30 名 HCW 随机分配到研究组和对照组的刷手服中。
每周从刷手服腹部区域、口袋和手上采集微生物样本。计算平均对数菌落形成单位(CFU)计数。测量手部卫生实践的依从性。比较服装和手部的平均对数 CFU 计数。
手部卫生的遵守措施为 78%(910/1,173),刷手服的遵守措施为 82%(223/273)。培养的遵守率为 67%(306/460)。在手和唯一阳性刷手服培养物的 HCW 中未观察到细菌手部负担的差异。未观察到万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)和革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNR)负担的差异。研究和对照刷手服的腿部 cargo 口袋(平均对数 CFU 计数,11.84 对照刷手服与 6.71 研究刷手服;[公式:见正文])、腹部区域(平均对数 CFU 计数,11.35 对照刷手服与 7.54 研究刷手服;[公式:见正文])、工作开始时腿部 cargo 口袋(平均对数 CFU 计数,11.96 对照刷手服与 4.87 研究刷手服;[公式:见正文])和工作结束时腹部口袋(平均对数 CFU 计数,12.14 对照刷手服与 8.22 研究刷手服;[公式:见正文])之间的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)CFU 计数存在差异。
研究刷手服与 MRSA 负荷降低 4-7 个平均对数有关,但与 VRE 或 GNR 无关。需要进行前瞻性试验来测量抗菌浸渍服装对 MRSA 传播率的影响。