Rynes Kristina N, Tonigan J Scott
University of New Mexico, Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA), Albuquerque, NM.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2012;30(2):179-189. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2012.663308. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
Most 12-step research recruits participants who are seeking treatment (cf. Kaskutas, Turk, Bond, & Weisner, 2003; Robinson, Cranford, Webb, & Brower, 2007), leaving open the question of how non-treatment-seeking individuals respond to 12-step involvement. The current study examined whether participants recruited from community-based Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) clubs or via advertisement/word-of-mouth differed in their 12-step attendance rates, substance use, and the association between these constructs compared to participants recruited from substance abuse treatment. Multilevel analyses showed that while associations between 12-step attendance and improved substance use did not differ by recruitment group, participants recruited from community-based AA clubs had higher 12-step attendance rates and a higher proportion of alcohol abstinent days than did all other participants. Results indicate that using diverse recruitment strategies may be necessary to obtain samples that are representative of the actual population of 12-step affiliates and to achieve results that estimate the true magnitude of 12-step effects.
大多数12步研究招募的是寻求治疗的参与者(参见卡斯库塔斯、特克、邦德和韦斯纳,2003年;罗宾逊、克兰福德、韦伯和布劳尔,2007年),这使得非寻求治疗的个体如何回应参与12步计划这一问题悬而未决。本研究考察了从社区戒酒互助会(AA)俱乐部招募的参与者或通过广告/口口相传招募的参与者,与从药物滥用治疗机构招募的参与者相比,在12步计划的出席率、物质使用情况以及这些构念之间的关联方面是否存在差异。多层次分析表明,虽然12步计划出席率与物质使用改善之间的关联在不同招募组中没有差异,但从社区AA俱乐部招募的参与者比所有其他参与者有更高的12步计划出席率和更高比例的戒酒天数。结果表明,使用多样化的招募策略可能有必要,以便获得能代表12步计划附属机构实际人群的样本,并取得能估计12步计划效果真实程度的结果。