Khanduri Sachin, Chaudhary Mriganki, Sabharwal Tushar, Usmani Tarim, Goyal Aakshit, Khanduri Shobha, Bhagat Saurav, Huda Fahimul, Yadav Santosh, Katyal Gaurav
Radiodiagnosis, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Pathology, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital.
Cureus. 2017 Aug 16;9(8):e1571. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1571.
Objective To suggest a low-cost, easily-operable, non-invasive imaging modality for cancer detection in rural settings. Method A total of 212 cases with palpable breast masses aged 18 - 65 years were enrolled and underwent thorough clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic (USG) evaluation. Imaging findings were reported using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) criteria. The findings were confirmed histopathologically. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results The malignancy rate was 35.8% (n = 76). On mammography, lesions size, margins, shape, calcification, and distorted arch/skin thickening were significantly associated with malignancy. On USG, the number of nodules, shape, margins, echotexture, posterior wall echo, through transmission changes, distorted arch/skin thickening, microlobulation, duct extension, and height/width ratio were significantly associated with malignancy. Independently, mammography and USG had a sensitivity of 78.1% and 80.3%, respectively, and a specificity of 83.3% and 89.0%, respectively. Using a positive result of either study as the criteria, the sensitivity was 97.4% and the specificity was 80.1%. Conclusion The combined use of mammography and USG provides high sensitivity and specificity, thus showing that a combination of two can be used as a screening tool for use in low resource rural settings.
目的 提出一种低成本、易于操作、非侵入性的成像方式用于农村地区癌症检测。方法 共纳入212例年龄在18 - 65岁、可触及乳腺肿块的患者,对其进行全面的临床、乳腺X线摄影及超声(USG)评估。成像结果依据美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS®)标准进行报告。结果经组织病理学证实。采用卡方检验分析数据。结果 恶性率为35.8%(n = 76)。在乳腺X线摄影中,病变大小、边缘、形状、钙化以及乳腺弓/皮肤增厚变形与恶性肿瘤显著相关。在超声检查中,结节数量、形状、边缘、回声特征、后壁回声、透声改变、乳腺弓/皮肤增厚变形、微叶状、导管延伸以及高/宽比与恶性肿瘤显著相关。单独来看,乳腺X线摄影和超声检查的敏感性分别为78.1%和80.3%,特异性分别为83.3%和89.0%。以任一检查的阳性结果为标准,敏感性为97.4%,特异性为80.1%。结论 乳腺X线摄影和超声检查联合使用具有高敏感性和特异性,表明两者联合可作为农村低资源地区的筛查工具。