Suppr超能文献

Pouring out the dirty bathwater without throwing away either the baby or its parents: commentary to Saunders et al.

作者信息

Lynøe Niels, Rosén Måns, Elinder Göran, Hallberg Boubou, Sundgren Pia, Eriksson Anders

机构信息

Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Feb;48(2):284-286. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-4003-x. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Pouring out the dirty bathwater without throwing away either the baby or its parents: commentary to Saunders et al.
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Feb;48(2):284-286. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-4003-x. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Shaken Baby Syndrome: a review.
Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2015 Jun;34(3):169-75. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2014.999394. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
5
[Diagnostic image (177). A lifeless infant. Shaken baby syndrome].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Feb 21;148(8):377.
6
[Shaken baby syndrome].
Rev Prat. 2011 May;61(5):655.
7
[Shaken baby syndrome].
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2010 Apr;108(2):e44-6. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752010000200019.
8
Shaken baby syndrome.
Indian Pediatr. 2004 Mar;41(3):280-2.
9
The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome.
BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):719-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7442.719.
10
[Diagnostic image (177). A lifeless infant. Shaken baby syndrome].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Jun 5;148(23):1169; author reply 1169.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical diagnoses among infants at entry in out-of-home care: A Swedish population-register study.
Health Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;2(8):e133. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.133. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Value-impregnated factual claims may undermine medical decision-making.
Clin Ethics. 2018 Sep;13(3):151-158. doi: 10.1177/1477750918765283. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
3
Shaken baby syndrome is real.
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Aug;48(8):1043-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4158-0. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Vinchon's responses raise additional questions about the shaken baby-study.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Jan;34(1):11-13. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3621-9. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Shaken baby syndrome and the risk of losing scientific scrutiny.
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Dec;106(12):1905-1908. doi: 10.1111/apa.14056. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct?
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Sep;106(9):1445-1446. doi: 10.1111/apa.13947. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
The scientific evidence regarding retinal haemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin.
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jul;106(7):1041-1042. doi: 10.1111/apa.13896. Epub 2017 May 19.
6
A misunderstanding. Response to Dr Bilo et al.
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jul;106(7):1046. doi: 10.1111/apa.13892. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
What are acceptable conclusions? Response to Dr. Ludvigsson.
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jul;106(7):1032. doi: 10.1111/apa.13890. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
9
Conflicts of interest issues. Response to Lucas et al.
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jul;106(7):1036. doi: 10.1111/apa.13891. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Authors' overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome.
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jul;106(7):1031. doi: 10.1111/apa.13887. Epub 2017 May 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验