Iisalo E, Heikkilä J
Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ann Clin Res. 1988;20(5):324-33.
Clinically significant differences between various beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs exist. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and exertional angina pectoris benefit from all types of beta-blockers. Drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic action (ISA) given intravenously may be safer in some patients with acute myocardial infarction than those drugs without ISA. In cardiac patients at rest they may have a vasodilator action and cause less myocardial depression than beta-blockers without ISA. When, however, the cardiac sympathetic tone is high pindolol and other beta-blockers with ISA act as any other beta-blockers, producing haemodynamic impairment. Studies have shown that beta-blockers with ISA confer less benefit in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction and they are not suitable for the treatment of obstructive cardiomyopathy. Non-selective beta-blockers may be advantageous in hypokalaemic arrhythmias. Beta 1-blockers may be preferred for patients with bronchoconstriction, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and, theoretically to some extent in theory also in patients with hypertension. The extent and nature of side effects may also influence the selection of the most suitable beta-blocker in cardiovascular therapy.
不同的β肾上腺素受体阻滞剂之间存在临床显著差异。患有缺血性心脏病和劳力性心绞痛的患者可从各类β受体阻滞剂中获益。对于一些急性心肌梗死患者,静脉给予具有内在拟交感活性(ISA)的药物可能比无ISA的药物更安全。在静息状态下的心脏病患者中,它们可能具有血管舒张作用,并且比无ISA的β受体阻滞剂引起的心肌抑制作用更小。然而,当心脏交感神经张力较高时,吲哚洛尔和其他具有ISA的β受体阻滞剂的作用与其他任何β受体阻滞剂相同,会产生血流动力学损害。研究表明,具有ISA的β受体阻滞剂在心肌梗死后的二级预防中获益较少,且不适用于梗阻性心肌病的治疗。非选择性β受体阻滞剂可能对低钾血症性心律失常有益。对于患有支气管收缩、糖尿病、外周血管疾病的患者,以及理论上在某种程度上对于高血压患者,β1受体阻滞剂可能更为适用。副作用的程度和性质也可能影响心血管治疗中最合适的β受体阻滞剂的选择。