Wynn Michelle A A, Esteller-Vico Alejandro, Legacki Erin L, Conley Alan J, Loux Shavahn C, Stanley Scott D, Curry Thomas E, Squires Edward L, Troedsson Mats H, Ball Barry A
Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, United States.
Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Theriogenology. 2018 Jan 15;106:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
During the latter half of gestation in mares, there is a complex milieu of pregnanes in peripheral blood. Progesterone concentrations are often assessed by immunoassay during late gestation as a measure of pregnancy well-being; however, interpretation of results is complicated by the numerous cross-reacting pregnanes present in high concentrations during late gestation. Further, many mares are supplemented with an exogenous progestin, altrenogest, which may also cross-react with existing assays and further confound interpretation. The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare differences in pregnane concentrations determined with four immunoassays compared to LC-MS/MS and 2) to assess cross-reactivity observed with the same immunoassays, specifically considering pregnenolone (P5), progesterone (P4), 5α-dihydroprogesterone (DHP), allopregnanolone, and altrenogest. Blood samples from four healthy mares in late gestation were evaluated by immunoassay and by LC-MS/MS. Measured immuno-reactive progesterone (ir-progesterone) concentrations differed (p < 0.0001) between immunoassays, although results were highly correlated (r = 0.85-1.0; p < 0.001). Measured ir-progesterone concentrations by immunoassay were linearly associated (r = 0.68-0.76; p < 0.001) with concentrations of P5, P4, DHP, and allopregnanolone determined by LC-MS/MS. There was no detectable cross-reaction of altrenogest in any immunoassay, but varying degrees of cross-reactivity was observed with other pregnanes analyzed. These data confirm ir-progesterone concentrations during late gestation vary depending upon the assay used and the cross-reactivity to other pregnanes present in late gestation, although the synthetic progestin altrenogest did not affect the results of any immunoassay tested.
在母马妊娠后期,外周血中存在复杂的孕烷环境。妊娠后期通常通过免疫测定法评估孕酮浓度,以此作为衡量妊娠状况的指标;然而,由于妊娠后期存在大量高浓度的交叉反应性孕烷,结果的解读变得复杂。此外,许多母马会补充外源性孕激素烯丙孕素,它也可能与现有的检测方法发生交叉反应,进一步混淆解读结果。本研究的目的是:1)比较四种免疫测定法与液相色谱 - 串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定的孕烷浓度差异;2)评估相同免疫测定法观察到的交叉反应性,特别考虑孕烯醇酮(P5)、孕酮(P4)、5α-二氢孕酮(DHP)、别孕烯醇酮和烯丙孕素。对妊娠后期的四匹健康母马的血样进行了免疫测定和LC-MS/MS评估。尽管结果高度相关(r = 0.85 - 1.0;p < 0.001),但免疫测定法测得的免疫反应性孕酮(ir-孕酮)浓度在不同免疫测定法之间存在差异(p < 0.0001)。免疫测定法测得的ir-孕酮浓度与LC-MS/MS测定的P5、P4、DHP和别孕烯醇酮浓度呈线性相关(r = 0.68 - 0.76;p < 0.001)。在任何免疫测定法中均未检测到烯丙孕素的交叉反应,但观察到与其他分析的孕烷存在不同程度的交叉反应性。这些数据证实,妊娠后期ir-孕酮浓度因所用检测方法以及与妊娠后期存在的其他孕烷的交叉反应性而异,尽管合成孕激素烯丙孕素不影响所测试的任何免疫测定法的结果。