• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术的临床回顾性对照研究

[Clinical retrospective control study of single-port laparoendoscopic and multi-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy].

作者信息

Liu X, Wen M K, Liu H Y, Sun D W, Lang J H, Fan Q B, Shi H H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;52(10):675-678. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.10.006.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.10.006
PMID:29060965
Abstract

To investigate clinical outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy compared with traditional multi-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Data of 81 patients with ovarian cystectomy from January 2016 to May 2017, the single-site group (40) and the multi-port group (41) in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected. The outcomes of single-site and multi-port groups were analyzed and compared, including: postoperative fever, operation time, blood loss, hemoglobin change, surgical complications, postoperative pain score, postoperative analgesic requirements, body image scale and cosmetic score, length of hospital stay, postoperative total cost. No complication was found in two groups. No difference was found in postoperative fever, blood loss, hemoglobin change, postoperative pain score, length of hospital stay, and total cost between the two groups (all 0.05). Operation time was (50±20) minutes in single-site group, and (40±15) minutes in multi-port group; postoperative analgesic requirements was 28%(11/40) in single-site group, and 7%(4/41) in multi-port group; cosmetic score was 22.6±2.6 in single-site group, and 17.3±2.6 in multi-port group; body image scale was 5.7±1.2 in single-site group, and 6.2±1.2 in multi-port group; these four clinical parameters were statistical differences (all 0.05). Laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy is feasible and safe, although it could't relieve the postoperative pian, it do offer a higher cosmetic satisfaction.

摘要

探讨单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术的临床疗效。回顾性收集2016年1月至2017年5月在北京协和医院行卵巢囊肿切除术的81例患者资料,分为单孔组(40例)和多孔组(41例)。分析比较两组的手术效果,包括:术后发热、手术时间、出血量、血红蛋白变化、手术并发症、术后疼痛评分、术后镇痛需求、体像量表及美容评分、住院时间、术后总费用。两组均未发现并发症。两组术后发热、出血量、血红蛋白变化、术后疼痛评分、住院时间和总费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。单孔组手术时间为(50±20)分钟,多孔组为(40±15)分钟;单孔组术后镇痛需求为28%(11/40),多孔组为7%(4/41);单孔组美容评分为22.6±2.6,多孔组为17.3±2.6;单孔组体像量表评分为5.7±1.2,多孔组为6.2±1.2;这四项临床指标差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术可行且安全,虽然不能减轻术后疼痛,但能提供更高的美容满意度。

相似文献

1
[Clinical retrospective control study of single-port laparoendoscopic and multi-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy].单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术的临床回顾性对照研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;52(10):675-678. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.10.006.
2
[Comparative study on transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and the three-port laparoscopy in treatment of ovarian cystectomy].经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与三孔腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿剥除术的对比研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;49(3):176-8.
3
Laparoendoscopic Single-site Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma.腹腔镜单孔与传统腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位症的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(5):813-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
Retrospective Cohort Study to Assess Outcomes, Cost-Effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Primary Vaginal Ovarian Cystectomy versus the Laparoscopic Approach.评估原发性阴道卵巢囊肿切除术与腹腔镜手术方法的结果、成本效益和患者满意度的回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):252-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Single-port (OctoPort) assisted extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy for the treatment of large ovarian cysts: compare to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy.单孔(八孔)辅助体外卵巢囊肿切除术治疗大型卵巢囊肿:与传统腹腔镜手术和开腹手术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
Comparison of Transvaginal and Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ovarian Cysts.经阴道与经脐腹腔镜下单孔手术治疗卵巢囊肿的比较。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00019.
8
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.在妇科中使用传统腹腔镜器械和手套端口技术的腹腔镜单孔手术:一位外科医生的经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
9
Single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign salpingo-ovarian pathology: a single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗良性输卵管卵巢病变:沙特阿拉伯的单中心经验
Ann Saudi Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):64-9. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.26.1.1200. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian dermoid cysts.经单孔与传统腹腔镜卵巢皮样囊肿剔除术的比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.05.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Technique Contrasted with Conventional Laparoscopy in Cystectomy for Benign Ovarian Cysts.腹腔镜单孔技术与传统腹腔镜技术在良性卵巢囊肿切除术中的对比
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023 Jul 12;99:100713. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100713. eCollection 2023.