• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中用于改善患者获得经济福利机会的在线工具的实施与影响:一项研究方案

Implementation and impact of an online tool used in primary care to improve access to financial benefits for patients: a study protocol.

作者信息

Aery Anjana, Rucchetto Anne, Singer Alexander, Halas Gayle, Bloch Gary, Goel Ritika, Raza Danyaal, Upshur Ross E G, Bellaire Jackie, Katz Alan, Pinto Andrew David

机构信息

Wellesley Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Upstream Lab, Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e015947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015947.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015947
PMID:29061603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5665212/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Addressing the social determinants of health has been identified as crucial to reducing health inequities. However, few evidence-based interventions exist. This study emerges from an ongoing collaboration between physicians, researchers and a financial literacy organisation. Our study will answer the following: Is an online tool that improves access to financial benefits feasible and acceptable? Can such a tool be integrated into clinical workflow? What are patient perspectives on the tool and what is the short-term impact on access to benefits?

METHODS

An advisory group made up of patients living on low incomes and representatives from community agencies supports this study. We will recruit three primary care sites in Toronto, Ontario and three in Winnipeg, Manitoba that serve low-income communities. We will introduce clinicians to screening for poverty and how benefits can increase income. Health providers will be encouraged to use the tool with any patient seen. The health provider and patient will complete the online tool together, generating a tailored list of benefits and resources to assist with obtaining these benefits. A brief survey on this experience will be administered to patients after they complete the tool, as well as a request to contact them in 1 month. Those who agree to be contacted will be interviewed on whether the intervention improved access to financial benefits. We will also administer an online survey to providers and conduct focus groups at each site.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Key ethical concerns include that patients may feel discomfort when being asked about their financial situation, may feel obliged to complete the tool and may have their expectations falsely raised about receiving benefits. Providers will be trained to address each of these concerns. We will share our findings with providers and policy-makers interested in addressing the social determinants of health within healthcare settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02959866. Registered 7 November 2016. Retrospectively registered. Pre-results.

摘要

目标

解决健康的社会决定因素已被视为减少健康不平等的关键。然而,基于证据的干预措施却很少。本研究源于医生、研究人员与一个金融知识普及组织之间正在进行的合作。我们的研究将回答以下问题:一个能改善获取经济福利机会的在线工具是否可行且可接受?这样的工具能否整合到临床工作流程中?患者对该工具的看法如何,以及它对获取福利的短期影响是什么?

方法

一个由低收入患者和社区机构代表组成的咨询小组为这项研究提供支持。我们将在安大略省多伦多市招募三个为低收入社区服务的初级保健机构,在曼尼托巴省温尼伯市也招募三个。我们将向临床医生介绍贫困筛查以及福利如何增加收入。鼓励医疗服务提供者在诊治任何患者时使用该工具。医疗服务提供者和患者将共同完成在线工具,生成一份量身定制的福利和资源清单,以协助获取这些福利。在患者完成工具后,将对其进行一次关于此次体验的简短调查,并要求在1个月后联系他们。那些同意被联系的患者将接受访谈,询问干预措施是否改善了获取经济福利的机会。我们还将对提供者进行在线调查,并在每个地点开展焦点小组讨论。

伦理与传播

关键的伦理问题包括,当被问及财务状况时患者可能会感到不适,可能会觉得有义务完成工具,以及可能会对获得福利产生不切实际的期望。将对提供者进行培训,以解决这些问题。我们将与有兴趣在医疗环境中解决健康社会决定因素的提供者和政策制定者分享我们的研究结果。

试验注册号

Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02959866。于2016年11月7日注册。追溯注册。预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f7/5665212/662c460b7d55/bmjopen-2017-015947f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f7/5665212/662c460b7d55/bmjopen-2017-015947f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f7/5665212/662c460b7d55/bmjopen-2017-015947f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation and impact of an online tool used in primary care to improve access to financial benefits for patients: a study protocol.基层医疗中用于改善患者获得经济福利机会的在线工具的实施与影响:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e015947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015947.
2
Screening for poverty and intervening in a primary care setting: an acceptability and feasibility study.在基层医疗环境中进行贫困筛查和干预:一项可接受性和可行性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):634-638. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy129.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
A novel income security intervention to address poverty in a primary care setting: a retrospective chart review.一项在基层医疗环境中解决贫困问题的新型收入保障干预措施:回顾性病历审查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 17;7(8):e014270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014270.
6
Screening for poverty and related social determinants to improve knowledge of and links to resources (SPARK): development and cognitive testing of a tool for primary care.筛查贫困和相关社会决定因素以增强对资源的了解和联系(SPARK):初级保健工具的开发和认知测试。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 25;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02173-8.
7
Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol.家庭医生为患者提供结直肠癌筛查网站和/或护士管理的电话帮助热线是否会增加粪便潜血试验的采用率?一项实用的群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2012 May 17;12:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-182.
8
Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff.社区实践环境中使用基于网络的交互式决策辅助工具进行结直肠癌筛查的感知障碍与促进因素:来自与基层医疗临床医生和医疗办公室工作人员焦点小组的研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 18;15(12):e286. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2914.
9
Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial.比较心理健康电子筛查与纸质筛查在检测孕妇抑郁、焦虑和心理社会风险方面的可行性、可接受性、临床效果和成本效益:一项随机平行组优效性试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Jan 2;15:3. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-3.
10
Patient and provider perspectives on eHealth interventions in Canada and Australia: a scoping review.患者和提供者对加拿大和澳大利亚电子健康干预措施的看法:范围综述。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Sep;20(3):5754. doi: 10.22605/RRH5754. Epub 2020 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Routinely asking patients about income in primary care: a mixed-methods study.在初级保健中定期询问患者收入情况:一项混合方法研究。
BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 22;6(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0090. Print 2022 Mar.
2
Social Determinants of Health 201 for Health Care: Plan, Do, Study, Act.医疗保健中的健康社会决定因素201:计划、执行、研究、行动。
NAM Perspect. 2021 Jun 21;2021. doi: 10.31478/202106c. eCollection 2021.
3
Exploratory study of "real world" implementation of a clinical poverty tool in diverse family medicine and pediatric care settings.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel income security intervention to address poverty in a primary care setting: a retrospective chart review.一项在基层医疗环境中解决贫困问题的新型收入保障干预措施:回顾性病历审查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 17;7(8):e014270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014270.
2
Addressing Unmet Basic Resource Needs as Part of Chronic Cardiometabolic Disease Management.满足未得到满足的基本资源需求作为慢性心脏代谢疾病管理的一部分。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):244-252. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7691.
3
Effects of Social Needs Screening and In-Person Service Navigation on Child Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
探索性研究:在多样化的家庭医学和儿科护理环境中,临床贫困工具的“真实世界”实施情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 23;18(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1085-0.
4
Screening for poverty and intervening in a primary care setting: an acceptability and feasibility study.在基层医疗环境中进行贫困筛查和干预:一项可接受性和可行性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):634-638. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy129.
5
Employment Interventions in Health Settings: A Systematic Review and Synthesis.就业干预在卫生环境中的应用:系统评价与综合。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Sep;16(5):447-460. doi: 10.1370/afm.2286.
6
Screening for social determinants of health in clinical care: moving from the margins to the mainstream.在临床护理中筛查健康的社会决定因素:从边缘走向主流。
Public Health Rev. 2018 Jun 22;39:19. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0094-7. eCollection 2018.
7
Association of the Social Determinants of Health With Quality of Primary Care.健康的社会决定因素与初级保健质量的关系。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 May;16(3):217-224. doi: 10.1370/afm.2236.
社会需求筛查和现场服务导航对儿童健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 7;170(11):e162521. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2521.
4
Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals.在临床实践中针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动:卫生专业人员框架
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E474-E483. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160177. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Building a Foundation to Reduce Health Inequities: Routine Collection of Sociodemographic Data in Primary Care.建立减少健康不平等的基础:初级保健中社会人口学数据的常规收集。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):348-55. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150280.
6
Surveillance and Screening for Social Determinants of Health: The Medical Home and Beyond.健康社会决定因素的监测与筛查:以家庭医疗为核心及其他相关领域
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Mar;170(3):189-90. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3269.
7
Swimming 'upstream' to tackle the social determinants of health.逆流而上应对健康的社会决定因素。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):138-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005008. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Association between household food insecurity and annual health care costs.家庭粮食不安全与年度医疗保健费用之间的关联。
CMAJ. 2015 Oct 6;187(14):E429-E436. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150234. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Improving Social Determinants of Health: Effectiveness of a Web-Based Intervention.改善健康的社会决定因素:基于网络的干预措施的效果。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):822-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
Looking Beyond Income and Education: Socioeconomic Status Gradients Among Future High-Cost Users of Health Care.超越收入与教育:未来高成本医疗使用者中的社会经济地位梯度
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):161-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 May 8.