Peiffer Friederike, Bejarano Sonia, Palavicini de Witte Giacomo, Wild Christian
Coral Reef Ecology Group, Marine Ecology Department, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Department of Ecology, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.
PeerJ. 2017 Oct 18;5:e3818. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3818. eCollection 2017.
The invasion of Indo-Pacific lionfish is one of the most pressing concerns in the context of coral reef conservation throughout the Caribbean. Invasive lionfish threaten Caribbean fish communities by feeding on a wide range of native prey species, some of which have high ecological and economic value. In Roatan (Honduras) a local non-governmental organisation (i.e. Roatan Marine Park) trains residents and tourists in the use of spears to remove invasive lionfish. Here, we assess the effectiveness of local removal efforts in reducing lionfish populations. We ask whether reefs subject to relatively frequent removals support more diverse and abundant native fish assemblages compared to sites were no removals take place. Lionfish biomass, as well as density and diversity of native prey species were quantified on reefs subject to regular and no removal efforts. Reefs subject to regular lionfish removals (two to three removals month) with a mean catch per unit effort of 2.76 ± 1.72 lionfish fisher h had 95% lower lionfish biomass compared to non-removal sites. Sites subject to lionfish removals supported 30% higher densities of native prey-sized fishes compared to sites subject to no removal efforts. We found no evidence that species richness and diversity of native fish communities differ between removal and non-removal sites. We conclude that opportunistic voluntary removals are an effective management intervention to reduce lionfish populations locally and might alleviate negative impacts of lionfish predation. We recommend that local management and the diving industry cooperate to cost-effectively extend the spatial scale at which removal regimes are currently sustained.
在整个加勒比地区的珊瑚礁保护背景下,印度-太平洋狮子鱼的入侵是最紧迫的问题之一。入侵的狮子鱼通过捕食多种本地猎物物种威胁着加勒比鱼类群落,其中一些猎物具有很高的生态和经济价值。在罗阿坦(洪都拉斯),一个当地的非政府组织(即罗阿坦海洋公园)培训居民和游客使用鱼叉清除入侵的狮子鱼。在此,我们评估当地清除行动在减少狮子鱼数量方面的有效性。我们询问,与未进行清除的地点相比,相对频繁进行清除的珊瑚礁是否能支持更多样化和丰富的本地鱼类群落。对定期进行清除和未进行清除的珊瑚礁上的狮子鱼生物量以及本地猎物物种的密度和多样性进行了量化。与未清除地点相比,每月定期进行两到三次狮子鱼清除、单位捕捞努力量平均捕获2.76±1.72条狮子鱼的珊瑚礁,其狮子鱼生物量降低了95%。与未进行清除努力的地点相比,进行狮子鱼清除的地点本地猎物大小鱼类的密度高出30%。我们没有发现证据表明清除地点和未清除地点的本地鱼类群落的物种丰富度和多样性存在差异。我们得出结论,机会性的自愿清除是一种有效的管理干预措施,可以在当地减少狮子鱼数量,并可能减轻狮子鱼捕食的负面影响。我们建议当地管理部门和潜水行业合作,以具有成本效益的方式扩大目前维持清除制度的空间范围。