Choudhari Nikhil S, Pathak-Ray Vanita, Kaushik Sushmita, Vyas Prateep, George Ronnie
V S T Glaucoma Centre, Dr. Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad 500034, India.
Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Glaucoma Society of India, India.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1580-1585. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.16. eCollection 2017.
To obtain information on the prevailing practice patterns of glaucoma specialists in India.
Glaucoma specialists attending the Annual Conference of the Glaucoma Society of India (GSI) were surveyed. This survey, conducted in 2013, was based on an interactive audience response system.
The information was obtained from 146 glaucoma specialists. Approximately half (=83; 57%) had ≥10y of experience in managing glaucoma and were in institutional practice (=74, 51%). Goldmann applanation tonometry was preferred by 103 (72%) specialists whilst =25 (17.4%) used non-contact tonometer. Indentation gonioscopy was favoured by two-thirds (=90, 66%) whereas stereoscopic optic disc examination and visual fields using Humphrey perimeter was performed by a majority of the specialists surveyed (=115, 86% and =114; 83% respectively). Nearly three quarter specialists (=96; 72%) preferred optical coherence tomography for imaging. The primary choice for treatment of angle closure disease and primary open angle glaucoma was laser (iridotomy, =117; 93%) and medical management (prostaglandin analogue, =104; 78%), respectively. Approximately only a third of the specialists surveyed (=37; 28%) were performing both trabeculectomy and implantation of a glaucoma drainage device and about half (=64; 47%) were not operating on congenital glaucoma at all.
This survey has found conformance with preferred practice patterns in several areas of diagnosis and management of glaucoma, but there was diversity in a few areas. The information is a significant step towards improvement of glaucoma care in India, including planning for future strategies.
获取有关印度青光眼专家现行诊疗模式的信息。
对参加印度青光眼协会(GSI)年会的青光眼专家进行了调查。这项于2013年开展的调查基于交互式观众反应系统。
从146名青光眼专家处获取了信息。约一半(=83;57%)的专家在青光眼管理方面有≥10年经验且在机构执业(=74,51%)。103名(72%)专家更倾向于使用Goldmann压平眼压计,而25名(17.4%)使用非接触眼压计。三分之二(=90,66%)的专家更青睐压陷式前房角镜检查,而接受调查的大多数专家(=115,86%)进行立体视盘检查,(=114;83%)使用Humphrey视野计进行视野检查。近四分之三的专家(=96;72%)更倾向于使用光学相干断层扫描进行成像。原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼的主要治疗选择分别是激光治疗(虹膜切开术,=117;93%)和药物治疗(前列腺素类似物,=104;78%)。接受调查的专家中约只有三分之一(=37;28%)同时进行小梁切除术和青光眼引流装置植入术,约一半(=64;47%)根本不开展先天性青光眼手术。
这项调查发现,在青光眼诊断和管理的几个领域符合首选诊疗模式,但在一些领域存在差异。这些信息是印度改善青光眼护理工作的重要一步,包括未来策略的规划。