Gordon-Bennett P S C, Ioannidis A S, Papageorgiou K, Andreou P S
Broomfield Hospital, Broomfield, Chelmsford, Essex, UK.
Eye (Lond). 2008 Nov;22(11):1410-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703089. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
This study surveys the current use of investigations for the management of glaucoma in hospital practice by UK ophthalmologists.
A total of 1007 questionnaires were posted to all active NHS consultant ophthalmologists. They were asked to indicate the type of hospital (whether university (UTH) or general (DGH) hospital), glaucoma specialist status, and availability and use of automated perimetry, disc photography, HRT, GDx, OCT, and pachymetry.
A total of 493 completed questionnaires were received and 469 were analysed: 284 (60.6%) DGH, 185 (39.4%) UTH, 144 (30.7%) glaucoma specialists. There was good availability of automated perimetry (467, 99.6%), disc photography (420, 89.6%), pachymetry (374, 79.7%), OCT (212, 45.2%), HRT (206, 43.9%), and GDx (59, 12.6%). A total of 308 (65.7%) consultants had at least one digital imaging instrument available. The majority of consultants used SAP (347, 74.0%) and SITA-fast (282, 60.1%) for glaucoma suspects, and for monitoring glaucoma (283, 60.3% and 197, 42.0%, respectively). Some used Esterman (155, 33.0%) and Goldmann fields (90, 19.2%) in addition to SAP and SITA-fast for glaucoma suspects. Few consultants used short-wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubled perimetry. Of the three imaging tests, HRT was the most commonly used investigation for disc asymmetry, early glaucoma, glaucomatous progression, ocular hypertension, normal tension glaucoma, and unreliable visual fields (P<0.0001). Where pachymeters were available, 333 (89.0%) consultants and 117 (98.3%) glaucoma specialists used pachymetry in glaucoma management.
There was some variation in the use of investigations for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma, reflecting the range of techniques available. SAP, SITA-fast, and pachymetry were the most commonly utilised investigations followed by HRT. Glaucoma specialist status, type of hospital, and presence of research influenced the availability and use of all investigations, except visual fields.
本研究调查了英国眼科医生在医院临床实践中对青光眼管理进行检查的当前使用情况。
共向所有在职的国民保健服务(NHS)眼科顾问医生发放了1007份问卷。要求他们指出医院类型(大学医院(UTH)还是综合医院(DGH))、青光眼专科医生身份,以及自动视野计、视盘照相、海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪(HRT)、GDx、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和角膜测厚仪的可用性及使用情况。
共收到493份完整问卷,其中469份进行了分析:284份(60.6%)来自综合医院,185份(39.4%)来自大学医院,144份(30.7%)来自青光眼专科医生。自动视野计(467份,99.6%)、视盘照相(420份,89.6%)、角膜测厚仪(374份,79.7%)、OCT(212份,45.2%)、HRT(206份,43.9%)和GDx(59份,12.6%)的可用性良好。共有308名(65.7%)顾问医生至少拥有一台数字成像仪器。大多数顾问医生对青光眼疑似患者使用标准自动视野计(SAP)(347份,74.0%)和快速筛选智能阈值自动视野计(SITA-fast)(282份,60.1%),对青光眼进行监测时也分别使用这两种方法(分别为283份,60.3%和197份,42.0%)。一些医生对青光眼疑似患者除了使用SAP和SITA-fast外,还使用Esterman视野计(155份,33.0%)和戈德曼视野计(90份,19.2%)。很少有顾问医生使用短波长自动视野计和倍频视野计。在三种成像检查中,HRT是用于视盘不对称、早期青光眼、青光眼进展、高眼压症、正常眼压性青光眼和不可靠视野检查最常用方法(P<0.0001)。在有角膜测厚仪的地方,333名(89.0%)顾问医生和117名(98.3%)青光眼专科医生在青光眼管理中使用角膜测厚仪。
在青光眼诊断和管理检查的使用上存在一些差异,这反映了现有技术的范围。SAP、SITA-fast和角膜测厚仪是最常用的检查方法,其次是HRT。青光眼专科医生身份、医院类型和研究的存在影响了除视野检查外所有检查的可用性和使用情况。