• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替罗非班维持时间对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的影响。

Influence of Tirofiban maintenance duration on patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Ji Zhen-Guo, Liu Hong-Bin, Liu Zhi-Hong, Ma Guo-Ping, Qin Li-Qiang, Dong Wei, Wang Li-Ya

机构信息

The Third Affiliated Shijiazhuang Hospital of Hebei Medical University, The Third Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, Shijiangzhuang, Hebei 050011, China.

The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei 050031, China.

出版信息

Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015 Jul 6;1(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2015.06.003. eCollection 2015 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.cdtm.2015.06.003
PMID:29062991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5643573/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and short term prognosis of Tirofiban in different treatment duration in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) combined with intracoronary injection.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients with acute STEMI were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups: control group ( = 61) and Tirofiban group ( = 64). The Tirofiban was used by intracoronary and intravenous administration in Tirofiban group which was randomly divided into three sub-groups according to the duration of Tirofiban by persistent intravenous injection for 12 hours, 24 hours or 36 hours. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow and myocardial perfusion grades were recorded immediately after PCI. The adverse cardiac events and cardiac death within 180 days of PCI, and the adverse effects (hemorrhage and thrombocytopenia) were compared between the two groups and within Tirofiban sub-groups.

RESULTS

Grade 3 in myocardial perfusion was significantly better in Tirofiban group than control group (85.94% 72.13%,  = 0.03) after PCI. There was one cardiac death in control group in 180 days after PCI. The adverse cardiac event rates between two groups was significant difference (16 patients in control group and only 8 in Tirofiban group,  = 0.047). There was no significant difference in incidence of hemorrhage complications and platelet counts between two groups. Nevertheless, hemorrhage complications in the 12- and 24-hour subgroups were less than 36-hour subgroup ( = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous Tirofiban treatment reduced the adverse cardiac events and improved short term prognosis without increasing the adverse reactions of the drugs in patients undergoing PCI. The less rate of hemorrhage complication can be achieved in short-duration of Tirofiban by intravenous injection after PCI.

摘要

目的

评估替罗非班在不同治疗时长下对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并冠脉内注射的疗效及短期预后。

方法

本研究共纳入125例急性STEMI患者。将其随机分为两组:对照组(n = 61)和替罗非班组(n = 64)。替罗非班组采用冠脉内及静脉给药,根据持续静脉注射替罗非班12小时、24小时或36小时的时长随机分为三个亚组。PCI术后立即记录心肌梗死溶栓血流及心肌灌注分级。比较两组及替罗非班亚组在PCI术后180天内的不良心脏事件及心源性死亡情况,以及不良反应(出血和血小板减少)。

结果

PCI术后替罗非班组心肌灌注3级明显优于对照组(85.94%对72.13%,P = 0.03)。对照组在PCI术后180天内有1例心源性死亡。两组不良心脏事件发生率有显著差异(对照组16例,替罗非班组仅8例,P = 0.047)。两组出血并发症发生率及血小板计数无显著差异。然而,12小时和24小时亚组的出血并发症少于36小时亚组(P = 0.01)。

结论

静脉应用替罗非班治疗可减少接受PCI患者的不良心脏事件,改善短期预后,且不增加药物不良反应。PCI术后短期静脉注射替罗非班可降低出血并发症发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/495d90399485/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/3a80cba809b5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/2a4cc6ae5eff/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/495d90399485/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/3a80cba809b5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/2a4cc6ae5eff/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa82/5643573/495d90399485/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Tirofiban maintenance duration on patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班维持时间对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的影响。
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015 Jul 6;1(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2015.06.003. eCollection 2015 Jun.
2
Effects of different doses of tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet drugs on platelet indices, vascular endothelial function, and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.不同剂量替罗非班联合双联抗血小板药物对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板指标、血管内皮功能及主要不良心血管事件的影响。
Platelets. 2024 Dec;35(1):2402301. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2024.2402301. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
Effects of intracoronary injection of nicorandil and tirofiban on myocardial perfusion and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI.冠状动脉内注射尼可地尔和替罗非班对老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术后心肌灌注及短期预后的影响
World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(3):157-163. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.03.005.
4
Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus tirofiban on the microvascular obstruction in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI: a cardiac MR study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中冠状动脉内与静脉内推注替罗非班对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者微血管阻塞的比较:一项心脏磁共振研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun;36(6):1121-1132. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01800-0. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班辅助治疗对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床益处。
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Jun;19(4):271-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f487e0.
6
[Efficacy comparison of combined intracoronary administration of high-dose adenosine and tirofiban versus intracoronary tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction].急性心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉内联合应用大剂量腺苷与替罗非班对比冠状动脉内应用替罗非班的疗效比较
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;41(10):839-44.
7
[Short- or long-outcome of early tirofiban in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention].[替罗非班早期应用于接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的短期或长期预后]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;53(4):273-7.
8
Beneficial effects of intracoronary tirofiban bolus administration following upstream intravenous treatment in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the ICT-AMI study.替罗非班冠脉内推注对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者静脉上游治疗的有益影响:ICT-AMI 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 May 25;165(3):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.082. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
9
Influences of different dose of tirofiban for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.不同剂量替罗非班对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 5;99(23):e20402. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020402.
10
[Clinical outcomes and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention combined with tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合替罗非班治疗的临床疗效及安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;35(11):1005-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of low-dose and long-course tirofiban in large hemispheric infarction.低剂量长疗程替罗非班治疗大脑半球大面积梗死的安全性与有效性
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 9;13:987859. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.987859. eCollection 2022.
2
Intracoronary pharmacological therapy versus aspiration thrombectomy in STEMI (IPAT-STEMI): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.经皮冠状动脉内药物治疗与血栓抽吸术治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(IPAT-STEMI):随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0263270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263270. eCollection 2022.
3
Combined thrombectomy and intracoronary administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors improves myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety of first generation drug-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.荟萃分析比较第一代药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在糖尿病患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效和安全性。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 May 1;111(9):1295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.281. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
2
High Bolus Tirofiban vs Abciximab in Acute STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI - The Tamip Study.高剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗用于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的比较——Tamip研究
Heart Views. 2012 Jul;13(3):85-90. doi: 10.4103/1995-705X.102145.
3
联合血栓切除术与冠状动脉内给予糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂可改善接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的心肌再灌注:一项荟萃分析。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017 Oct;14(10):614-623. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.10.002.
[High-dose tirofiban in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention].
[大剂量替罗非班用于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Jul 24;92(28):1981-3.
4
Treatment with tirofiban for acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a systematic review and network analysis.替罗非班治疗急性冠脉综合征(ACS):系统评价和网络分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Mar;28(3):351-70. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.657299. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
5
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary and intravenous administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.比较 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经冠状动脉内和静脉内给予糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 15;109(8):1124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.053. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
6
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征时冠状动脉内与静脉内给予糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;108(9):1244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.039.
7
Beneficial effects of intracoronary tirofiban bolus administration following upstream intravenous treatment in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the ICT-AMI study.替罗非班冠脉内推注对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者静脉上游治疗的有益影响:ICT-AMI 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 May 25;165(3):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.082. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy.出血预防策略。共识与争议。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 28;58(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.039.
9
Intracoronary bolus-only compared with intravenous bolus plus infusion of tirofiban application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.冠状动脉内推注给药与静脉推注联合替罗非班输注在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):59-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23109. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
10
Intracoronary compared to intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients reduces 30-day mortality and target vessel revascularization: a randomized trial.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,冠状动脉内与静脉内推注阿昔单抗比较:可降低 30 天死亡率和靶血管血运重建:一项随机试验。
J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Apr;24(2):105-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00616.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.