Ettinger Ronald L, Goettsche Zachary S, Qian Fang
Department of Prosthodontics and Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Gerodontology. 2018 Mar;35(1):11-17. doi: 10.1111/ger.12305. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
The aim of this study was to re-examine the teaching of geriatric dentistry in the USA dental schools, to identify curriculum content and compare the findings to previous reports.
All dental schools in the United States were contacted via email with a questionnaire to assess the teaching of geriatric dentistry. Non-responding schools were sent a minimum of three reminder emails to complete the survey. A statistical analysis was performed. Descriptive statistics were conducted to profile the variables of interest. Bivariate analysis was performed to explore if any of the variables were related using Fisher's exact test, non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Fifty-six of the 67 dental schools completed the questionnaire. Geriatric dentistry was taught in all dental schools; for 92.8%, the course was compulsory. We found that 62.5% were teaching it as an independent course, 25% as an organised series of lectures and 8.9% as occasional lectures in parts of other courses. Clinically, 84.2% have some form of compulsory education in geriatric dentistry. Public schools were marginally associated with an increased interest in expanding the geriatric dentistry curriculum (P = .078). No differences were found between these variables and school location.
Geriatric dentistry is now required in 92.8% of dental schools. The teaching of traditional topics has not changed much; however, the number of gerontological topics has increased. Clinical teaching needs to be expanded, as in only 57.1% of schools was it a requirement. The ageing imperative will require research to determine the impact of teaching on services to the geriatric community.
本研究旨在重新审视美国牙科学院老年牙科学的教学情况,确定课程内容,并将研究结果与之前的报告进行比较。
通过电子邮件向美国所有牙科学院发送问卷,以评估老年牙科学的教学情况。对于未回复的学校,至少发送三封提醒邮件以完成调查。进行了统计分析。采用描述性统计对感兴趣的变量进行描述。使用Fisher精确检验、非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行双变量分析,以探讨是否有任何变量相关。
67所牙科学院中有56所完成了问卷。所有牙科学院均开设了老年牙科学课程;其中92.8%的课程为必修课。我们发现,62.5%的学校将其作为独立课程授课,25%作为一系列有组织的讲座授课,8.9%作为其他课程部分内容中的不定期讲座授课。在临床方面,84.2%的学校在老年牙科学方面有某种形式的义务教育。公立学校在扩大老年牙科学课程兴趣方面略有增加(P = 0.078)。这些变量与学校所在地之间未发现差异。
现在92.8%的牙科学院都要求开设老年牙科学课程。传统主题的教学变化不大;然而,老年学主题的数量有所增加。临床教学需要扩大,因为只有57.1%的学校将其作为要求。老龄化的迫切需求将需要进行研究,以确定教学对老年社区服务的影响。