Myocardial strain characteristics and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND

Objective of this study was to make an assessment of standard functional and defor-mation parameters (strain) in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and the evaluation of their prognostic impact.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TAVR received CMR on a 1.5 T whole-body scanner at 3 months after the procedure. Deformation parameters (strain, strain rate, velocity, displacement) were assessed in lon-gitudinal, circumferential and radial orientation using a feature tracking approach. Primary outcome measure was defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients formed the study population. Deformation parameters were significantly reduced in all three orientations for strain (longitudinal: -12.1 ± 5.4% vs. -15.9 ± 1.96%, p < 0.0001; radial: 34.4 ± 15.3% vs. 47.2 ± 11.4%, p < 0.0001; circumferential: -16.8 ± 4.3% vs. -21.1 ± 2.5%, p < 0.0001) and strain rate (longitudinal: -0.79 ± 0.33%/s vs. -0.91 ± 0.23%/s, p = 0.043; radial: 2.5 ± 1.2%/s vs. 2.9 ± 0.9%, p = 0.067; circumferential: -1.1 ± 0.6%/s vs. -1.3 ± 0.3%/s, p = 0.006) in comparison to a healthy control population. Median follow-up was 614 days. During this period, 13 endpoints occurred (cumulative event rate of 10.7%). Patients with event by trend exhibited poorer strain and strain rate in longitudinal and radial orientation without reaching statistical significance (longitudinal strain: -11.2 ± 5.4% vs. -12.3 ± 5.4%, p = 0.52; longitudinal strain rate: -0.73 ± ± 0.23%/s vs. 0.80 ± 0.35%/s, p = 0.53; radial strain: 29.5 ± 19.6% vs. 35.2 ± 14.5%, p = 0.24; radial strain rate: 2.2 ± 1.6%/s vs. 2.6 ± 1.2%/s, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of left ventricular deformation parameters by CMR revealed functional abnormalities in comparison to healthy controls. Prognostic significance remains to be further investi-gated.