• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域性外科治疗障碍:公众观点调查和地理空间分析。

Barriers to Regionalized Surgical Care: Public Perspective Survey and Geospatial Analysis.

机构信息

New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, NY.

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, New York, NY.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):73-78. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002556.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002556
PMID:29064896
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe public willingness to participate in regionalized surgical care for cancer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Improved outcomes at high-volume centers following complex surgery have driven a push to regionalize surgical care. Patient attitudes toward regionalization are not well described.

METHODS

As part of the Cornell National Social Survey, a cross-sectional telephone survey was performed. Participants were asked about their willingness to seek regionalized care in a hypothetical scenario requiring surgery. Their responses were compared with demographic characteristics. A geospatial analysis of hospital proximity was performed, as well as a qualitative analysis of barriers to regionalization.

RESULTS

Cooperation rate was 48.1% with 1000 total respondents. They were an average of 50 years old (range 18 to 100 years) and 48.9% female. About 49.6% were unwilling to travel 5 hours or more to seek regionalized care for improved survival. Age >70 years [odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.19-0.60] and perceived distance to a center >30 minutes (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.86) were associated with decreased willingness to seek regionalized care, while high income (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.39-3.16) was associated with increased willingness. Proximity to a major center was not associated with willingness to travel (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.22). Major perceived barriers to regionalization were transportation, life disruption, social support, socioeconomic resources, poor health, and remoteness.

CONCLUSION

Americans are divided on whether the potential for improved survival with regionalization is worth the additional travel effort. Older age and lower income are associated with reduced willingness to seek regionalized care. Multiple barriers to regionalization exist, including a lack of knowledge of the location major centers.

摘要

目的

描述公众对参与癌症区域化外科治疗的意愿。

背景资料概要

复杂手术后在高容量中心取得的改善结果推动了外科治疗的区域化。患者对区域化的态度尚未得到很好的描述。

方法

作为康奈尔国家社会调查的一部分,进行了一项横断面电话调查。参与者被要求在需要手术的假设情况下,对他们是否愿意寻求区域化治疗进行回答。他们的回答与人口统计学特征进行了比较。对医院接近度进行了地理空间分析,并对区域化的障碍进行了定性分析。

结果

合作率为 48.1%,共有 1000 名受访者。他们的平均年龄为 50 岁(范围为 18 至 100 岁),其中 48.9%为女性。约 49.6%的人不愿意旅行 5 小时或更长时间去寻求区域化治疗以提高生存率。年龄 >70 岁[优势比(OR)0.34,95%置信区间(95%CI)0.19-0.60]和感觉距离中心 >30 分钟[OR 0.60,95%CI 0.41-0.86]与降低寻求区域化治疗的意愿相关,而高收入[OR 2.09,95%CI 1.39-3.16]与增加意愿相关。靠近主要中心与旅行意愿无关[OR 0.92,95%CI 0.67-1.22]。区域化的主要感知障碍包括交通、生活中断、社会支持、社会经济资源、健康状况不佳和偏远地区。

结论

美国人对区域化是否能提高生存率以值得付出额外的旅行努力存在分歧。年龄较大和收入较低与降低寻求区域化治疗的意愿相关。区域化存在多种障碍,包括对主要中心位置缺乏了解。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Regionalized Surgical Care: Public Perspective Survey and Geospatial Analysis.区域性外科治疗障碍:公众观点调查和地理空间分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):73-78. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002556.
2
Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Traveling to the Safest Hospitals in the United States for Complex Cancer Surgery.前往美国最安全的医院进行复杂癌症手术的动机、障碍和促进因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184595. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4595.
3
Physician attitudes toward regionalization of adult critical care: a national survey.医生对成人重症监护区域化的态度:一项全国性调查。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):2149-54. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a009d0.
4
Travel patterns of cancer surgery patients in a regionalized system.区域化系统中癌症手术患者的就医模式。
J Surg Res. 2015 Nov;199(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Perceived barriers to the regionalization of adult critical care in the United States: a qualitative preliminary study.美国成人重症监护区域化的感知障碍:一项定性初步研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Nov 17;8:239. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-239.
6
Disparities in Travel-Related Barriers to Accessing Health Care From the 2017 National Household Travel Survey.2017 年美国家庭旅行调查:旅行相关障碍导致获得医疗保健服务的机会不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2325291. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25291.
7
Accessing surgical care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Patient variation in travel distance and choice to bypass hospitals to reach higher volume centers.获取胰十二指肠切除术的外科治疗服务:患者在旅行距离和选择绕过医院以到达更高容量中心方面的差异。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(8):1318-1326. doi: 10.1002/jso.25750. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Regionalization of Congenital Heart Surgery in the United States.美国先天性心脏病外科的区域化。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Spring;32(1):128-137. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS TO ACCESS HEALTH CARE FOR SURGICAL CONDITIONS IN MALAWI a cross sectional nationwide household survey.马拉维全国范围内的横断面家庭调查:医疗条件下获得医疗保健的交通障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 5;19(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6577-8.
10
Decentralization and Regionalization of Surgical Care: A Review of Evidence for the Optimal Distribution of Surgical Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.手术护理的去中心化和区域化:对中低收入国家手术服务最佳分布的证据综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Sep 1;8(9):521-537. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.43.

引用本文的文献

1
Health system regionalization's infrastructural dimensions: A scoping review.卫生系统区域化的基础设施维度:一项范围综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Apr 30;14:161. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1858_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Rural Women Have a Prolonged Recovery Process after Esophagectomy.农村女性食管癌切除术后恢复过程较长。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;16(6):1078. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061078.
3
Association of Textbook Outcome and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival Following Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Matters More?
教科书结局和医院容量与肝细胞癌切除术后长期生存的关系:哪个更重要?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2763-2770. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05880-w. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
4
Time, Space, and Place: Can Geospatial Information Systems Clarify the Tension Between Regionalization and Access for Complex Cancer Surgery?时间、空间与地点:地理空间信息系统能否厘清复杂癌症手术中区域化与可及性之间的矛盾?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):7915-7917. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14292-8. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
5
Letter to a Young Surgeon During Coronavirus Disease 2019.致一位在2019冠状病毒病疫情期间的年轻外科医生的信。
Ann Surg Open. 2020 Aug 11;1(1):e003. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000003. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Impact of network treatment in patients with resected pancreatic cancer on use and timing of chemotherapy and survival.网络治疗对接受手术切除的胰腺癌患者化疗的应用和时机选择以及生存的影响。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad006.
7
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery at the Highest-Performing vs Chosen Local Hospitals.最高绩效医院与选择的当地医院结直肠癌手术模拟结果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55999.
8
Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume.癌症护理区域化对患者数量的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2331-2338. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13029-3. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Simulated data-driven hospital selection for surgical treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer in older adults.模拟数据驱动的老年分化型甲状腺癌手术治疗医院选择。
Surgery. 2023 Jan;173(1):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.047. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
10
Impact of Perioperative Thromboembolic Complications on Future Long-term Risk of Venous Thromboembolism among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Complex Gastrointestinal Surgery.围手术期血栓栓塞并发症对 Medicare 受益人群接受复杂胃肠道手术后未来长期静脉血栓栓塞风险的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3064-3073. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05080-4. Epub 2021 Jul 19.