• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Foreword: Sticks and Stones: Moving Toward a More Productive Peer-Review Process for Authors and Reviewers.

作者信息

Miller Karen Hughes, West Daniel C, Karani Reena

机构信息

K.H. Miller is 2017 chair, Research in Medical Education Program Planning Committee, and associate professor of graduate medical education, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky. D.C. West is immediate past chair, Research in Medical Education Program Planning Committee, and professor of pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. R. Karani is incoming chair, Research in Medical Education Program Planning Committee, and senior associate dean for undergraduate medical education and curricular affairs and director, Institute for Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):Si-Siii. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001925.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001925
PMID:29065015
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Foreword: Sticks and Stones: Moving Toward a More Productive Peer-Review Process for Authors and Reviewers.前言:棍棒与石头:迈向为作者和审稿人打造更高效同行评审流程的征程。
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):Si-Siii. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001925.
2
RIME foreword: a behind-the-scenes look at this year's Research in Medical Education Program.医学教育研究计划前言:本年度医学教育研究计划幕后一瞥。
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1507-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a380f0.
3
Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.《埃塞俄比亚医学杂志》的同行评审与编辑流程:对投稿稿件状态的十年评估
Ethiop Med J. 2013 Apr;51(2):95-103.
4
Writing an effective response to reviewers: the goal is to improve the study and get it published!撰写对审稿人的有效回复:目标是改进研究并使其发表!
J Bras Pneumol. 2019 Feb 28;45(1):e20190020. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190020.
5
2016: Reviewing for Radiology-Reporting Guidelines and Why We Use Them.2016:审查放射学报告准则及使用原因。
Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):659-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161204. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
Maturation (and déjà vu) comes to the research in medical education program at age 51.医学教育研究项目在51岁时走向成熟(以及似曾相识之感)。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1307-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826768eb.
7
Why should I review journal manuscripts?我为什么要审阅期刊稿件?
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014 Aug;65(3):193. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2014.06.001.
8
Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.审稿人的评分是否受到其自身工作引用的影响?对提交手稿和同行评审报告的分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;67(3):401-406.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
9
Peer-review in neuropsychology: can we increase effectiveness without sacrificing rigor?
Cortex. 2002 Jun;38(3):403-5. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70668-3.
10
Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.稿件提交的同行评审:有效且高效撰写评论的操作指南。
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;10(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004766.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Scoring Rubric for Editorial Evaluation of Peer-review Quality: A Pilot Study.同行评审质量编辑评估评分表的制定和验证:一项试点研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;25(2):254-263. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18432.