Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, 35516 Mansoura, Egypt.
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, 35516 Mansoura, Egypt; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Horus University in Egypt, New Damietta, Egypt.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2018 Feb 15;191:413-420. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.10.049. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
Two simple, sensitive, rapid, validated and cost effective spectroscopic methods were established for quantification of antihistaminic drug azelastine (AZL) in bulk powder as well as in pharmaceutical dosage forms. In the first method (A) the absorbance difference between acidic and basic solutions was measured at 228nm, whereas in the second investigated method (B) the binary complex formed between AZL and Eosin Y in acetate buffer solution (pH3) was measured at 550nm. Different criteria that have critical influence on the intensity of absorption were deeply studied and optimized so as to achieve the highest absorption. The proposed methods obeyed Beers low in the concentration range of (2.0-20.0μg·mL) and (0.5-15.0μg·mL) with % recovery±S.D. of (99.84±0.87), (100.02±0.78) for methods (A) and (B), respectively. Furthermore, the proposed methods were easily applied for quality control of pharmaceutical preparations without any conflict with its co-formulated additives, and the analytical results were compatible with those obtained by the comparison one with no significant difference as insured by student's t-test and the variance ratio F-test. Validation of the proposed methods was performed according the ICH guidelines in terms of linearity, limit of quantification, limit of detection, accuracy, precision and specificity, where the analytical results were persuasive.
建立了两种简单、灵敏、快速、经过验证且具有成本效益的光谱方法,用于定量测定抗组胺药物氮卓斯汀(AZL)的原料药和药物制剂。在第一种方法(A)中,在 228nm 处测量酸性和碱性溶液之间的吸光度差,而在第二种方法(B)中,在醋酸盐缓冲溶液(pH3)中 AZL 与曙红 Y 形成的二元配合物在 550nm 处进行测量。深入研究并优化了对吸光度有重要影响的不同标准,以获得最大的吸收。所提出的方法在浓度范围(2.0-20.0μg·mL)和(0.5-15.0μg·mL)内符合比尔定律,方法(A)和(B)的回收率为(99.84±0.87)%和(100.02±0.78)%。此外,所提出的方法可用于药物制剂的质量控制,而不会与制剂中的其他添加剂发生冲突,并且通过学生 t 检验和方差比 F 检验,证明与比较方法获得的分析结果没有显著差异,具有很好的兼容性。根据 ICH 指南,对所提出的方法进行了验证,包括线性、定量限、检测限、准确度、精密度和专属性,分析结果令人信服。