Suppr超能文献

使用简化经处理家庭污水排放相关化学混合物的前瞻性和回溯性风险评估方法。

Use of prospective and retrospective risk assessment methods that simplify chemical mixtures associated with treated domestic wastewater discharges.

机构信息

Tetra Tech, Owings Mills, Maryland, USA.

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Mar;37(3):690-702. doi: 10.1002/etc.4013. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

Abstract

A framework is presented that is intended to facilitate the evaluation of potential aquatic ecological risks resulting from discharges of down-the-drain chemicals. A scenario is presented using representatives of many of the types of chemicals that are treated domestically. Predicted environmental chemical concentrations are based on reported loading rates and routine removal rates for 3 types of treatment: trickling filter, activated sludge secondary treatment, and activated sludge plus advanced oxidation process as well as instream effluent dilution. In tier I, predicted effluent concentrations were compared with the lowest predicted-no-effect concentration (PNEC) obtained from the literature using safety factors as needed. A cumulative risk characterization ratio (cumRCR) < 1.0 indicates that risk is unlikely and no further action is needed. Otherwise, a tier 2 assessment is used, in which PNECs are based on trophic level. If tier 2 indicates a possible risk, then a retrospective assessment is recommended. In tier 1, the cumRCR was > 1.0 for all 3 treatment types in our scenario, even though no chemical exceeded a hazard quotient of 1.0 in activated sludge or advanced oxidation process. In tier 2, activated sludge yielded a lower cumRCR than trickling filter because of higher removal rates, and the cumRCR in the advanced oxidation process was << 1.0. Based on the maximum cumulative risk ratio (MCR), more than one-third of the predicted risk was accounted for by one chemical, and at least 90% was accounted for by 3 chemicals, indicating that few chemicals influenced the mixture risk in our scenario. We show how a retrospective assessment can test whether certain chemicals hypothesized as potential drivers in the prospective assessment could have, or are having, deleterious effects on aquatic life. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:690-702. © 2017 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

摘要

提出了一个框架,旨在促进评估由于下水道化学物质排放而导致的潜在水生生态风险。本文提出了一个使用许多国内处理的化学物质代表的情况。预测的环境化学浓度基于报告的加载率和 3 种处理方法的常规去除率:滴滤器、活性污泥二级处理和活性污泥加高级氧化工艺以及溪流稀释。在第 I 层,将预测的流出物浓度与文献中获得的最低预测无影响浓度 (PNEC) 进行比较,根据需要使用安全系数。累积风险特征比 (cumRCR) <1.0 表示风险不大,无需采取进一步行动。否则,将使用第 2 层评估,其中 PNEC 基于营养水平。如果第 2 层表明存在可能的风险,则建议进行回顾性评估。在第 1 层,即使在活性污泥或高级氧化工艺中没有化学物质的危害商超过 1.0,我们情景中的所有 3 种处理类型的 cumRCR 均>1.0。在第 2 层,由于去除率较高,活性污泥的 cumRCR 低于滴滤器,而高级氧化工艺的 cumRCR <<1.0。基于最大累积风险比 (MCR),超过三分之一的预测风险归因于一种化学物质,至少 90%归因于 3 种化学物质,表明在我们的情景中,很少有化学物质会影响混合物风险。我们展示了回顾性评估如何测试在预期评估中被假设为潜在驱动力的某些化学物质是否对水生生物产生或正在产生有害影响。环境毒理学与化学 2018;37:690-702。 © 2017 作者。环境毒理学与化学由 Wiley 期刊出版公司代表 SETAC 出版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验