Ann Arbor, Mich.
From the Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan; the Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School; and Michigan Medicine.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):516-525. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004031.
The volume of medical literature is growing at a rate that renders decision-making difficult without specialized summary tools. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are important research instruments used to condense and clarify a broad scope of information into manageable summaries. When used effectively, these reports can pool cumulative data across primary studies, formulate clinical guidelines, and guide future research endeavors. However, errors in study design can result in ineffective or misleading analyses. This article presents the appropriate uses for systematic review and meta-analysis by introducing a framework for creating summary studies, and supplying specific examples of pitfalls in study design and execution.
医学文献的数量正在以一种没有专业总结工具就难以做出决策的速度增长。系统评价和荟萃分析是重要的研究工具,用于将广泛的信息浓缩并澄清为可管理的摘要。当有效地使用时,这些报告可以汇总来自主要研究的累积数据,制定临床指南,并指导未来的研究工作。然而,研究设计中的错误可能导致无效或误导性的分析。本文通过介绍创建总结研究的框架,并提供研究设计和执行中陷阱的具体示例,提出了系统评价和荟萃分析的适当用途。