文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

密集剂量化疗 10 年结果显示高危原发性乳腺癌的生存优于常规方案:AGO 三期 iddEPC 试验的最终结果。

Ten-year results of intense dose-dense chemotherapy show superior survival compared with a conventional schedule in high-risk primary breast cancer: final results of AGO phase III iddEPC trial.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):178-185. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx690.


DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdx690
PMID:29069370
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary breast cancer (BC) patients with extensive axillary lymph-node involvement have a limited prognosis. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) trial compared intense dose-dense (idd) adjuvant chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk BC patients. Here we report the final, 10-year follow-up analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolment took place between December 1998 and April 2003. A total of 1284 patients with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive 3 courses each of idd sequential epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) q2w or standard epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC → P) q3w. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 658 patients were assigned to receive iddEPC and 626 patients were assigned to receive EC → P. The median duration of follow-up was 122 months. EFS was 47% (95% CI 43% to 52%) in the standard group and 56% (95% CI 52% to 60%) in the iddEPC group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87; log-rank P = 0.00014, one-sided]. This benefit was independent of menopausal, hormone receptor or HER2 status. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI 55% to 63%) for patients in the standard group and 69% (95% CI 65% to 73%) for patients in the iddEPC group (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87; log-rank P = 0.0007, two-sided). Nine versus two cases of secondary myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome were observed in the iddEPC and the EC → P arm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The previously reported OS benefit of iddEPC in comparison to conventionally dosed EC → P has been further increased and achieved an absolute difference of 10% after 10 years of follow-up.

摘要

背景:广泛腋窝淋巴结受累的原发性乳腺癌(BC)患者预后有限。妇科肿瘤学工作组(AGO)试验比较了密集剂量(idd)辅助化疗与高危 BC 患者常规计划化疗。这里报告最终的 10 年随访分析。

患者和方法:招募于 1998 年 12 月至 2003 年 4 月进行。共 1284 例 4 个或更多腋窝淋巴结受累的患者被随机分配接受 3 个疗程的 idd 序贯表柔比星、紫杉醇和环磷酰胺(iddEPC)每 2 周 1 次或标准表柔比星/环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇(EC→P)每 3 周 1 次。无事件生存(EFS)是主要终点。

结果:共 658 例患者接受 iddEPC 治疗,626 例患者接受 EC→P 治疗。中位随访时间为 122 个月。标准组的 EFS 为 47%(95%CI 43%至 52%),iddEPC 组为 56%(95%CI 52%至 60%)[风险比(HR)0.74,95%CI 0.63-0.87;对数秩 P=0.00014,单侧]。这种获益与绝经状态、激素受体或 HER2 状态无关。标准组的 10 年总生存(OS)为 59%(95%CI 55%至 63%),iddEPC 组为 69%(95%CI 65%至 73%)(HR=0.72,95%CI 0.60-0.87;对数秩 P=0.0007,双侧)。iddEPC 组和 EC→P 组分别有 9 例和 2 例继发性髓性白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征。

结论:与常规剂量 EC→P 相比,此前报告的 iddEPC 的 OS 获益进一步增加,10 年随访后绝对差异达到 10%。

相似文献

[1]
Ten-year results of intense dose-dense chemotherapy show superior survival compared with a conventional schedule in high-risk primary breast cancer: final results of AGO phase III iddEPC trial.

Ann Oncol. 2018-1-1

[2]
Intense dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide compared with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer: mature results of an AGO phase III study.

J Clin Oncol. 2010-5-10

[3]
German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-positive Study (GAIN): a phase III trial comparing two dose-dense regimens (iddEPC versus ddEC-PwX) in high-risk early breast cancer patients.

Ann Oncol. 2017-8-1

[4]
Intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide versus weekly paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer) for neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto-GBG 84): A randomised phase III trial.

Eur J Cancer. 2018-12-5

[5]
Survival analysis of the randomised phase III GeparOcto trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy of intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide versus weekly paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer) for patients with high-risk early breast cancer.

Eur J Cancer. 2022-1

[6]
PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer--outcome on prognosis.

Ann Oncol. 2011-3-7

[7]
Fluorouracil and dose-dense chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer: an open-label, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised phase 3 trial.

Lancet. 2015-3-2

[8]
Effect of Tailored Dose-Dense Chemotherapy vs Standard 3-Weekly Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Recurrence-Free Survival Among Women With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA. 2016-11-8

[9]
Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel Followed by Capecitabine As Adjuvant Therapy for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results From the GEICAM/2003-10 Study.

J Clin Oncol. 2015-9-28

[10]
Postoperative dose-dense sequential versus concomitant administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel in patients with node-positive breast cancer: 5-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group HE 10/00 phase III Trial.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011-12-21

引用本文的文献

[1]
Feasibility Study for Long-Term Cardiotoxicity in Dose-Dense Treated Cancer Patients.

Int J Heart Fail. 2025-4-21

[2]
GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024-7-30

[3]
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in European Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-4-29

[4]
Which Patients Need Chemotherapy? From Pathological Risk Factors to Gene Signatures and Evaluation of Endocrine Response.

Breast Care (Basel). 2023-12

[5]
Selection of breast cancer subtypes to improve benefits of intensive dose‑dense chemotherapy: A systematic meta‑analysis.

Oncol Lett. 2023-11-7

[6]
Advances in the Management of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Int J Mol Sci. 2023-8-5

[7]
Moment of truth-adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer improves overall survival: An individual participant data and trial-level Meta-analysis.

Breast. 2022-8

[8]
Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BMC Cancer. 2022-3-12

[9]
Survival benefit of platinum-based regimen in early stage triple negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021-12-21

[10]
Potentially Overestimated Efficacy of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel compared with Solvent-based Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

J Cancer. 2021-6-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索